Audio Player
Starting at:
Proving Gravity Is Not Quantum | Ivette Fuentes
August 23, 2024
•
1:45:58
•
undefined
Audio:
Download MP3
⚠️ Timestamps are hidden: Some podcast MP3s have dynamically injected ads which can shift timestamps. Show timestamps for troubleshooting.
Transcript
Enhanced with Timestamps
261 sentences
15,451 words
Method: api-polled
Transcription time: 104m 49s
The Economist covers math, physics, philosophy, and AI in a manner that shows how different countries perceive developments and how they impact markets. They recently published a piece on China's new neutrino detector. They cover extending life via mitochondrial transplants, creating an entirely new field of medicine. But it's also not just science, they analyze culture, they analyze finance, economics, business, international affairs across every region.
I'm particularly liking their new insider feature was just launched this month it gives you gives me a front row access to the economist internal editorial debates where senior editors argue through the news with world leaders and policy makers and twice weekly long format shows basically an extremely high quality podcast whether it's scientific innovation or shifting global politics the economist provides comprehensive coverage beyond headlines.
As a TOE listener, you get a special discount. Head over to economist.com slash TOE to subscribe. That's economist.com slash TOE for your discount.
Hola, Miami! When's the last time you've been in Burlington? We've updated, organized, and added fresh fashion. See for yourself Friday, November 14th to Sunday, November 16th at our Big Deal event. You can enter for a chance to win free wawa gas for a year, plus more surprises in your Burlington. Miami, that means so many ways and days to save. Burlington. Deals. Brands. Wow! No purchase necessary. Visit bigdealevent.com for more details.
When Galileo invented the telescope, people didn't want to look through it. And that also makes me think about a lot of the stuff happening in science where people refuse to look at certain theories.
For decades, reconciling quantum theory with gravity has been the holy grail of theoretical physics. But what if the path forward isn't through ever more convoluted mathematics, but rather through ingenious experiments we could perform right now? Professor Yvette Fuentes, the close collaborator of Roger Penrose, is proposing just that.
groundbreaking tests using ultra-cold atoms and quantum technologies that could probe the ostensibly quantum nature of space-time. Yet, despite its potential, many researchers in the field are hesitant to pursue these ideas. Is it the allure of purely theoretical work?
the inertia of established research programs, or simply the challenge of breaking away from fashionable thinking. In this episode, we'll explore Professor Fuentes' inventive approaches to testing quantum gravity and why they're being overlooked by much of the physics community.
Professor Yvette Fuentes, it's a long time coming. I'm super excited to have you on here. The audience, it's going to be a treat for them. They don't realize it right now, maybe, but the audience is in for a great treat. So thank you. And the floor is yours.
Thank you very much. I was just telling you just now that I love your podcast and I listen to it, see it very often, let's say. So it was very nice meeting you just now because I felt that I've met you forever. So this feeling of after seeing you often in the evenings and then it's like, oh, well, that's, that's you there. So that was really very nice.
I was also telling you just now that I saw some of the podcasts that you were talking about string theory. Physics is like whack-a-mole. Einstein said, I have this idea, acceleration and gravity are the same. Problem, how do I make this work with a scalar field? So that's like a little mole that comes up. He whacks it down. He says, okay, maybe it was a mistake to unite space and time. But then problem crops up. You have to introduce a variable speed of light.
So then he's like, okay, let me knock that down. Forget about scalars. Let me introduce tensors, a different mathematical object. You knock that down. In order for string theory to work, it needs to be 26 dimensional. And it only had bosons at this point in the story. Okay, why don't we add something called supersymmetry? So we knock it down. Okay, cool. Problem. There's still many types of string theory. And now there's 10 dimensional, not four dimensional, but it's some progress. Okay, solution. You combine some heterotic strings. Okay, problem. We still have five and we have gauge anomalies.
and how when one works in foundations of physics and in unification there's like that I think you mentioned the that people say it's like the only game in town and how there is this sort of social pressure to work in in the field. So I am working at the moment in the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity
Like this is kind of really focusing on on that problem is a more recent thing. I still don't have actually my my results available but they're coming up of course not the full thing but i think a nice interesting step i think we managed to achieve.
but I come from a very different sort of place and I thought that maybe the story of that could be interesting in the light of the things you've been discussing. Yes and I've been looking at your research in the evenings as well and so this is a wonderful experience for myself and I would love for the audience to get familiar with you so please go over your recent results.
Yes, so I became interested in the foundations of physics as a student at university. I had a teacher, Luis de la Peña, who I enjoyed. He was teaching me quantum mechanics and I particularly like his class because he talked a lot about interpretations of quantum mechanics.
I was really fascinated with that he was very generous because at some point i approach him and i said you know i want to work with you on this topic and he said you know what it's been very difficult for me it's been a really difficult path and i don't want that for you.
so i would suggest work on something more sort of mainstream and if you're still interested when when you're grown up let's say you can come back and i think that is somehow related to what what you're saying that he took a different path and he found it extremely difficult and he wanted to spare me of that i think he could have just said yes great you know a good student come and work with me and instead of that he i think he was very generous by by saying that
So, um, uh, I think, well, what, what, I approached him also because I wanted to go to Fermilab. There was like the possibility, a competition to go and spend the summer there. And, um, and I asked him for a reference letter and he said, why would I give you a reference letter? And I said, well, because, you know, I got like A's in all your classes. He said, well, many students do that. And then from there, we just went on talking.
What I told him was that I was finishing my degree and starting to see what I wanted to do. I mentioned to him that all of my classmates that were interested in theory were actually going into string theory.
And that I actually, when I learned about a string theory, like all of my classmates, I was absolutely fascinated with it. I think it's a beautiful idea that we treat particles like point-like systems and then the idea that there is another dimension or more dimensions, there are strings and how you could unify the notion of different particles in this way is beautiful and I loved it. But then once I got more into it,
and you know sort of issues started to pop out especially the many dimensions then I thought this reminds me of the epicycles and let me explain you know what I meant so I'm sure that most of people in the audience are familiar with this but back in the time people wanted to describe the trajectories of planets
But back then people used to think that they had to follow nature had to follow circles because circles is the perfect figure is a shape. It's really interesting how we get into these ideas and we get so stuck in them. Right. And those are the ones that don't let us make progress. So we can come back to that maybe later because we've been trying to unify quantum mechanics in general relativity.
for more than a hundred years and we're probably stuck with something equivalent to the to the perfect figure and we're unwilling to let go of that and maybe we can talk about later about that because i there's like some some ideas actually i i think that maybe even consciousness could be sort of something missing
In the equation, let's say. Oh, yeah. So if you try to describe the trajectory of a planet using circles, well, first one was not possible. People said, I remember I also heard you talk about how you get a problem and boom, you bang it and you fix it. And then another one comes out and you bang it in. No. So right, right. The whack-a-mole. Exactly.
Yes so you do that with the circles and okay you add another circle and that doesn't work that well so you add another one and well back then people used to need something like 600 circles to more or less describe the trajectory of a planet and then came Kepler and says they're not circles they're ellipses and boom
No more necessary to hit things with a hammer anymore. It just falls in everything beautifully, right? So when I heard about, when I looked into string theory with a bit more detail, not much, I very soon felt this reminds me of the epicycles. It can't be right.
And I told that to my teacher, to Luis de la Peña, and he smiled and he said, I'm going to give you the reference letter where you want to go. That's interesting. What was it specifically about what you said that changed his mind? Well, I think he liked that I was so, in a way, critical of string theory and that I was not going where everybody else was going, because I just had a feeling this is not right.
Now, didn't he mean to go into string theory when he said that you should go into physics in a more mainstream manner? No, and then let me tell you what that is, because that was another important point. When I was finishing my degree, I think also, like many students, I was also sort of in love with astronomy. That's always like many students go also in that direction, because it's just so attractive. And I did an undergraduate thesis on Seaford galaxies.
and i enjoyed that very much but after my work and i even my first paper is on seaford galaxies i thought well i could spend the rest of my life studying these beautiful objects but something is missing i didn't have it sort of very i was so aware of of it like i'm now but what was missing for me was that
Studying these beautiful objects, I felt were not really bringing me to the point of asking questions like what is the fabric of reality?
Something was missing, not with the galactic data, but with what even the most ideal answer to any astronomical question could provide to the foundational aspects of the questions at your heart. Yes, somehow I felt like studying. I could spend my whole life studying safer galaxies and that would probably be a lot of fun. I already had a really good paper with a letter and everything.
But i felt like i'm not gonna be able if i go in that direction to to really focus on the questions that i'm really interested in. I see and i guess you know like i was i was more interested in understanding sort of more foundational questions like deeper what is reality about. So i was in the in the cafeteria.
at the university and suddenly a colleague of mine, I'm still working with him, Pablo Barberis, ran into the cafeteria when I was doing my homework and he said, they demonstrated quantum teleportation. And I was like, what? That was Anton Silinger's experiment. But then it would play a role in my life as well, because I ended up being a professor, a visiting professor in Vienna within that group for three years.
But well back then it was like oh some people in Europe demonstrated quantum teleportation and also told me you know what they also managed to trap single particles single atoms in an iron trap and in a cavity.
And I remember my teacher, Luis de la Pena, used to say quantum mechanics is a theory that doesn't apply to single particles in experiments. We're always doing experiments with an ensemble and many particles and stuff like that. So then when I heard that, I said, OK, that area is going to get super interesting because if now they can do experiments with single atoms, we will be able to address some of these fundamental questions.
And that's where I thought, okay, that's the right thing to do. So when we had already a little bit talked to Luis about that. And when I told him, you know, what about quantum optics? He said, that's excellent. So I went to Imperial College to work in the group of Peter Knight.
and when I arrived well with the idea of doing quantum optics and when I arrived there everybody was working on quantum information and entanglement measures and so on so I end up doing a PhD in let's say in the interface of quantum optics and quantum information that went really well I did I did very well and then from there I went to do a postdoc at the perimeter institute
yes my neighbor yeah yes exactly you're in toronto right when i arrived there was really exciting because i think i was the first or the second postdoc to arrive there to work in quantum information cool the institute wasn't like established as it is now yet it was uh the building was like the old post office in waterloo i was it was so cool you we had like sofas and you know like a bar and and uh
and a blackboard and we sit like at home and you know it was really like a fantastic experience but when i got there there was one group in quantum information very small one and then there was string theory and quantum gravity and foundations of physics and i started to so we were such a small group i started to attend the seminars in
gravity and quantum field theory incurred space and i go very jealous i felt very jealous i thought like oh gosh i'm missing out on i'm missing out on something because you were in the quantum information section yeah yeah and and people in quantum information were talking about quantum cryptography the idea of quantum cryptography is beautiful but
if you work on that then it's again like oh how do you make a hack and how do you fix it and again you get lost in those things and i was thinking no no no this is really not not for me
So I thought maybe I change and I work on general relativity, but I had already made a few jumps. No, I went from astrophysics, a paper there to quantum optics. And then I have a paper on quantum computing. What am I going to do? And I thought, well, maybe it's not a very good idea. And I started without knowing this was kind of a new thing. I started like the innocence as a young researcher, I started to mix them.
So I wrote a paper that's called Alice falls into a black hole entanglement in non inertial frames. Okay. That really that's been, it's my most cited paper. Wow. And it really sort of opened a door for me, let's say in, in, in the scientific world, because you were also talking about how difficult it is and how competitive it is to get, you know, a name and known and, and, and opposition and so on.
So what I did is that I applied what I had learned in Imperial College about measures of entanglement to quantum field theory in curved space-time and to eternal black holes and so on. And it was a very new thing to do. Now there is like a field more or less established in that direction that people call it relativistic quantum information. So I was having a great time working on that.
But it was all very academic, you know, it's like, oh, entanglement in black holes and things like that. I still felt that I'm now getting lost in math and getting lost in math. When you say it was too academic, you mean too theoretical, removed from experimental underpinnings? Yes, exactly. Yes. And then I got into this idea that, you know what, I want to like bring this stuff
to a point where i can do an experiment i mean of course not me i'm a theoretician but propose an experiment so i hired a postdoc um his name is carlos who was someone doing theory but very close for experiments and he was working with superconducting circuits and stuff like that and it was really funny because i just thought i didn't even have a clear idea of how we would get there i just said this is where i want to go and we together started to work with quantum metrology
Applying it to quantum field theory in space time. So now that's going to go into my slides for the super long introduction. But I thought it was like irrelevant to what you were talking about recently. And I actually managed to start proposing experiments. Some of them at least partially have already been tested, you know, and like the experiment have been done. And that became sort of my path studying
Quantum and relativity, but really proposing experiments. I was not working in unification because I was working with quantum field theory in curved space time. So I'm going to tell you a little bit more about that in a, in a moment. And, and, and then by doing that, that finally brought me to, to an idea that is like my own inspired by the work of Roger Penrose, who I like, I talk to him very often.
And then I, I managed to kind of come up with a theory that can be tested in the experiments and we're going to do that very soon. Cool. So that's the kind of the story and of, of why, you know, my talk, which is also about unification comes from a very different perspective comes from someone who's, you know, background is in quantum optics and quantum information.
and looking at experiments and then sort of trying to see what can we learn from these theories and their interplay and try to make theories informed by the experiment.
Wonderful. Thank you for that introduction. I have two quick questions. Maybe they're addressed in the talk itself, but so you were in firstly astrophysics, then you went to quantum information, then you saw some talks on general relativity and you thought maybe you want to go into that field, but you said it would be too much of a jump of you jumping back and forth. But would it be because astrophysics does it not already use general relativity? So how much of a jump would that be? It'd be like jumping backward rather than jumping to the side, no?
Well, it could have been a bit like jumping back, but the work that I was doing in astrophysics was not really related to general relativity directly. You know, it was more I was doing statistical studies on how companions of safer galaxies could trigger the material of the galaxy to go into the black hole and so on.
Yeah, I guess because of the type of analysis that I was doing, it would have been like another jump. Okay, okay, cool. And then now you also mentioned that you work on quantum field theory and curved spacetime. Now, some people would see that as unification because general relativity has something to do with curved spacetime. So can you please delineate those two? Yes, actually, I'm going to do that in my slides. So I mean, but very quickly,
That's the beauty of quantum field theory in curved space-time is that it allows you to study some, let's say quantum effects and relativistic deflects they interplay in some scales, but it's not the full theory. It doesn't resolve actually what I think is the most interesting question.
This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast? Smart move. Being financially savvy? Smart move. Another smart move? Having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling. Just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state.
Um, so yeah, let me get started and I'm going to get there very, very soon. Wonderful. Take it away. The floor is yours. Okay. Thanks. So, um, well, uh, yeah, there, there are many fundamental questions, um, that, uh, are unanswered and very interesting ones. Um, and I wrote in this slide, just a few that I find fascinating and maybe some of them I work on as well. Um, so for example, what is the nature of dark matter?
That is a big one. So yeah, well, questions like is dark energy driving the accelerated expansion of the universe? What's the physics of the early, very early times and cosmology? Does the equivalence principle holds for quantum systems and so on? There's many, many interesting questions and fundamental questions, physics that don't have answers.
And underpinning our difficulties to find answers to these questions is our difficulty actually to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity. I went to a conference a few years ago and it was all about how can we use quantum experiments for fundamental physics and many of these fundamental questions came up and then someone in the audience, a colleague of mine, got up
And said well but nobody's addressing you know kind of the elephant in the room what's the elephant in the room well that's you know we for more than a hundred years have tried to unify quantum physics and general relativity and incompatible.
so how does that affect all these other interesting questions and then then that's where i think i felt yes that that is a really interesting question to to answer so this is like the very typical cube that one sees in theoretical physics but it's just you know a bit designed in a different way where you have
Relativity on one axis so that would be see the velocity of light then gravitation on another dimension that would be the gravitational constant and then quantum physics would be h bar. So this cube here i'm trying to show that well we have some pieces of the puzzle so they're parts of the theories that kind of some answer some of the questions or work well in some scales.
So we have a lot of work done in the last years in different pieces of this puzzle, but we don't have the whole picture yet. So quantum field theory in curved space, I would say is like one of these big pieces of a puzzle, but it doesn't do the whole thing yet. So I'll go into why not in a moment.
Okay so this actually title of this slide should we quantize gravity or gravitize quantum theory comes from Roger Pendrose and what he means by that is should we keep the principles of quantum theory and modify general relativity that's what we understand more by quantum gravity.
Or should we do the contrary, keep the principles of general relativity and modify quantum theory? So I guess, you know, like most people working on the unification, maybe follow the first line of quantizing gravity. But Roger thinks differently, thinks that quantum theory has a problem anyways, which is the measurement problem.
So he supports more, let's say the root of keeping the principles of general relativity and then trying to modify quantum theory to bring them together. Now we both agree that it's more likely you have to modify both of them. But let's say Roger would always give more priority to general relativity in that sense. So I was writing here in this slide like a few things.
about both theories so let's go first to quantum theory like same as in classical physics time is absolute in quantum theory so clocks take at the same rate for any observer independent of its state of motion and this comes from
The theory being invariant under Galilean transformation. So the underpinning transformations are Galilean transformations just as in classical physics. So in the same note that inherits that space and time are very different notions. The Schrodinger equation treats space and time completely different. It has one derivative in time and two in x.
It treats time like a parameter and then positions can be quantized and you use operators, which are completely different mathematical structures. So then already from there, they would be incompatible with the relativity. And just for some clarification, quantum theory means quantum mechanics and not quantum field theory. Yes. Yes. I guess because of my background, I use that more when I say I like to use actually more quantum physics.
But that I'm just talking about like, you know, Schrodinger equation fields is like a step more, you know, yes. Well, then in quantum theory, we have the superposition principle. So particles can be in a superposition of two distinguishable locations at a time.
And then, well, this is what Roger calls, well, many people call the measurement problem, but in quantum theory, the outcome of measurements is probabilistic, fundamentally probabilistic. And then when we want to measure, let's say, space or time, we have an uncertainty principle.
That tells us that if you measure positions very precisely, then you cannot simultaneously measure momentum and so on. Also, it's kind of a bit of a summary of some of these, let's say, fundamental principles of the theory. Yes. Then on the other hand, in which way they're different and why are they incompatible? Well, in relativity, time and length
are not absolute, are observer dependent. So the underlying transformations in relativity are Lorentz transformations, and if you look at them, they mix space and time. So let's say the more radical thing I think that we learned from Einstein is that space and time are not different in the way that we understand them in classical physics, and also in our experience, right? If you tell anyone space and time are like
A bit of the same thing people would be shocked with that but that's what Einstein showed us that they actually belong together in a higher dimensional object which is space time and they're both dependent on the state of the observer.
And then you have in relativity, if you have gravity, for example, it curves space time. And then if you look at two different points in space, you can see that time flows at different rates, at different points.
So already there you can see that you have to treat space and time on an equal footing. So let's say equations if you have that you're having a second derivative in space you should also have a second derivative in time.
So that you can already see how that is already incompatible with quantum theory. And so a little bit also the question of time is at the heart of our difficulties to unify the theory.
And then you could think about things how would you see if a math is in a superposition of two different locations and then time flowing at different rates. I mean the Schrodinger equation has only like one derivative in time is one time.
You cannot think about such questions yet with the theories that we have currently, no? Another thing, just to finish with the slides, like in relativity, we don't have this thing about the outcome of measurements being probabilistic, but it's a deterministic theory in that sense, and we can measure space and time as precise as we want.
But well, in my opinion, the most interesting question that we have to answer is what happens when we have a massive superposition where the mass is in a superposition of two different locations in space. And this is something that you cannot answer with quantum field theory in curved space time, because, well, I'm going to go more into that later.
But the theory assumes that you have sort of a fixed background, so a fixed space time metric, which is a solution of Einstein's equations.
But the fields themselves or you know the mass itself doesn't curve it so you couldn't answer this question. I think this is really an interesting and important question because we know for example from the experiments that you can have the electromagnetic field in a superposition. So you can take an electron and put the electron in a superposition and then you can see that the quantum fields.
generated are in quantum states so we were talking about quantum optics and quantum optics has been you know a theory that has been tested in many many experiments and we know that the electromagnetic field can be in quantum states and now the big question is can gravity also be in a quantum state in in in the sense and well
If the mass is very small, well yes, because the moment that we have, let's say, an atom in a superposition,
In a way, the gravitational field produced by the atom is also in a superposition, but I think the big question is more like if that's a stable situation or not. And that's where Roger, and I'm going to go more into detail of that, comes in and says, well, you can, but that is a very unstable situation and gravity collapses the wave function, which would then resolve the measurement problem.
And that would explain more like the transition between the classical world and the quantum world that would explain why we don't see let's say this cop in a superposition of here and there and so on.
I'm going to talk more about that in a moment. But I guess my point here is that I think this is the most interesting question to answer. And there are good reasons to believe that gravity could act different to the other forces. And that is because gravity is the only one that has an equivalence principle. So there is not an equivalence principle for the others. And also the equivalence principle
If you're in a lift and you don't have any way to look at what's happening, so in a box outside, you could not distinguish when you feel an acceleration if that is because you're in the presence of a gravitational field or just because the box is being accelerated. And that is something that is specific from gravity and that could distinguish gravity from the other forces.
So that is something also that Roger argues that might hint at gravity being fundamentally different. Okay, so I mean obviously the question is very important per se, but also as I said it underpins other very interesting fundamental questions in physics. I found this picture, the one with the
With the stars and so on, uh, on online is a very famous one. I actually, you know, one of the things I lost, I guess I lost my talk just a few moments ago where all the credits to the images. So I'm sorry. I had done that detail and so on. But well, when I saw this picture, I liked it very much and it made me think about how was it when we were trying to make sense of, let's say if you want cosmology of where are we, what's this?
Let's say world that we're seeing what are those points in the sky that appear at night in the way what's the universe and so on without instruments no so i can imagine i like to have a romantic image of that of you know people sitting around the fireplace and looking at the sky and trying to make sense of where are we.
Without the telescope you can imagine how hard that would be and what sort of theories humanity came up with when the only possibility was to use our own instrument that are our eyes and look at the sky. Then Galileo invented the telescope. It's very interesting that as well that when Galileo invented the telescope many people didn't want to look through it.
That also makes me think about a lot of the stuff happening in science where people sort of refuse to look at certain theories. That reminds me, I also heard you talk about that and you were talking about, well, if you're working in string theory or in quantum gravity, don't you have sort of the moral responsibility of looking at what other options are there?
Yes right and that i think it's like refusing to pay attention to competitive theories or other ideas i think it's a little bit equivalent like refusing to look through the telescope interesting. Somebody comes with a new invention says look look at what's happening you say no i don't want to even look but that happened. No since since then telescopes have developed incredibly.
We have amazing like the latest pictures that you you see are just like amazing what what they can do but well now with very good instruments we could look at the sky we can look really into the past of our universe and then see that oh wow it looks like the universe is an expansion and so on and we can come up with more meaningful theories with better theories thanks to those observations.
Same if you think about the microscopic world. So the Greek came with the idea of the atoms. But again, it's not until you build a microscope and you can look into the microscopic world that you can do better atomic physics. So I'm trying to make the point here about how important have instruments been in us making better theories and understanding things better, right?
So when it comes to these scales where quantum mechanics and general relativity interplay, we're blind. We don't even have our instrument. We don't even have our eyes. We don't have anything. So how do you go about right when you do that? So I think I understand string theory and loop quantum gravity and many of these very mathematical approaches.
In that sense is that you do what you can when you what you have at hand and what we're able to do is super powerful studies with mathematics because our mathematics is very developed and you were also talking about that how actually string theory has allowed mathematics to develop so much and so much we've learned about mathematics
Thanks to those theories but when you when you come up with theories and mathematics well there's many possibilities you can make many theories almost as many as you can think about but which one is the right one.
you know i can make a theory but then i need to see if actually nature behaves like my theory predicts right and i can have a competing theory a different one and which one is the right maybe even contradicting it's the two theories in principle in their predictions how do you know which one is the right one you need to go to the experiment you need to go to those instruments and we
Will we i'm going to argue that we sort of have them already and we need to start looking for resolving these questions of unification alright what i think we want to do is to get into this cycle in which let's say you come up with an idea so this would be philosophy and creativity so going back to the example of the atoms.
Right so the greek came up with the using philosophy and creativity and so on with the idea that there must be something in matter that you cannot keep dividing so there must be this unit and the idea of it cannot be divided anymore so the idea of an atom then well if you want to.
Observe an atom well that's like a really long way around right but you have to do some theory about what is an atom so well a very very long time after.
People started to develop better theories of the atom or, for example, I don't know, the pancake theory where you had some, you know, electrons like raisins in a pancake or even better bores model, or you have like the nuclear and the electrons going around like if they were like planets around the sun, right? So you need to create some some theory so that you can build an apparatus and then observe
This idea that you had that there's atoms because you cannot build a machine or propose an experiment or develop a new sensor without some sort of theory. Your theory might be wrong, but at least it gives you a starting point to say, okay, now I'm going to build this machine. At Capella University, learning online doesn't mean learning alone.
You'll get support from people who care about your success, like your enrollment specialist who gets to know you and the goals you'd like to achieve. You'll also get a designated academic coach who's with you throughout your entire program. Plus, career coaches are available to help you navigate your professional goals. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu. Then you built, let's say, the microscope.
And you look through it and then you get some sort of signals and at some point like a detector's click or something like that and you say, oh, there's my aptum. Right. So and then you might then find out that your theory was actually not very good, but then you can improve it and modify your apparatus. And then you get into this really good cycle.
Where you can start making better theories all the time and verify them into the experiment. So this is what happened with quantum optics.
It seems like this is what happens with the general theory. So if I'm understanding you correctly, it sounds like what you're saying is you're initially on your couch or in your shower, an idea comes to you, it's an intuition, you then formulate it with words, natural language, you then have to formulate it into mathematical language. And then you have to check that against quote unquote reality with an experiment. Yes. So you propose an experiment and the experimental proposal, that's what I work a lot on an experimental proposals is also mathematical.
Right i have to write down my theoretical proposal this is what you. This is your hamiltonian and these are your measurements and this is the position and i claim that you should be able to build this device and i'm going to show you like one of my works in that talk about of course of my proposals to do that and then you need to build it and then check.
Okay and you were giving a specific example in quantum optics please continue with quantum optics is very healthy cycle and i think that's why there's been so much progress in quantum technologies is because this happens all the time people come up with an idea for a sensor and they write papers about it they make a proposal then experimental group.
gets a hold of it, they work together and boom, they showed that and there comes again the cycle and it's a wonderful field. And I think I was used to that. So when I started to work on Alice falls into a black hole and entanglement in black holes, I was like, Oh, gosh, I can't check if what I propose is correct. Because there's no way to make a measurement in a black hole. And that's how I started to say no, no, I want to do theory that it can actually, you know,
Still work at the interplay of quantum mechanics in general activity but that i can test in the in the lab. So that's like my my group and most of the last i don't know maybe fifteen years that's what i've been.
What is FP?
Gr quantum theory i forgot what did i put here for the most like quantum theory for sure gr and fundamental physics is fundamental physics yeah maybe that's a funny figure. Okay so when when i was at university and i learned about quantum mechanics and general relativity back in the day.
Will you know for example louise la penya would say quantum mechanics only applies to a few particles and very smart very small scale so where electrons and atoms live.
And general relativity applies to the large scales. No, starting with actually with from GPS, we need to get the positions we have, we need to make corrections due to general relativity. So the proper time in Earth on Earth is different from the proper time in a satellite. And you need to make corrections to have the positions that we have in in in GPS. So it would start like say from those kind of scales,
Onwards i mean we know that general relativity doesn't really apply to all the scales because you know the rotating curves of galaxies the observations there contradict the predictions of general relativity and from there like the whole of the idea of dark matter comes about no so it doesn't really apply but let's say generally your students and you're told quantum physics applies to the very small and general relativity to the very big.
Now because of this circle that I was telling you about, now the experiments in quantum technologies developed amazingly and now completely challenge this picture and I want to tell you a lot about that. So I'm going to talk about three things. One is long range
quantum entanglement so what are the longest distances at which we can prepare superposition states or entangled states and so on and what how can we study such situations and what can we learn about the interplay of quantum mechanics and general relativity through long-range quantum experiments then high sensitivity
Actually when I started to work on using quantum theory, I wanted to, you know, measure some relativistic effects. Some of my colleagues in general relativity were laughing at me because they were saying, well, you know, at a small scales, forget it. Space time is a bit flat. It's a completely flat. Sorry. You won't see anything. I'll show you that that's not true.
And these are already like experiments that have reached relativistic effects. We're just not looking through the telescope right yet because, well, I'll tell you more when I get there. The one that hasn't gotten to scales where gravity kicks in in an important manner is large mass quantum experiments. So I also want to tell you about the progress in that
I have a quick question if you don't mind. Yes, sure.
i'm going to actually go into the details of the question that you just asked me i have a slide on that so it sounds like a really wonderful question right right to the point but the short answer now is that people brush the the questions in a way out the you know they they they find solutions which i uh don't think are solutions that they're like let's say well maybe
Approximately work but actually are not the right thing to do if you want to be let's say rigorous with what you're doing and actually that it gives you the opportunity to answer these questions so i i'll go i have a slide on on that exactly the question that you're asking me great we think alike yes i noticed that before you from the podcasts in many ways actually cool
Okay, so let's talk about the long range experiments. When I was a student, you know, when Pablo came, my colleague into the cafeteria and told me they demonstrated quantum teleportation in the lab that was in Vienna, that was Anton Salinger, it was in a tabletop experiment. So you have like a table that could fit in this room, let's say, with mirrors and lasers and so on. And that's how experiments look
like in those times. Then Anton and some years later wanted to see how big can the distances can the experiment grow such that you still have entanglement. So this is entanglement between photons. Okay. And he was able to demonstrate entanglement across two different buildings in Vienna.
So well, that was very promising. So he said, well, let's let's keep going. And then in 2011, he was already doing the experiment across 144 kilometers and in the Canary Islands. Oh, so they're not physically connected tubes that connected the two buildings nor in this 1000 kilometer case. Well, there are many experiments that are connected that are connected by a waveguide.
People do experiments like that, but no, these are like free space experiments. Interesting. Yeah, they're beautiful. They're very, very interesting. So Anton had a student from China who then moved back to China and then, you know, he's made a lot of progress there and together they launched a satellite, which is called Mikus, which is completely purposed.
To study quantum entanglement and teleportation and cryptography and so on. So this was they launched it in 2016. And and then they've demonstrated entanglement across thousands of kilometers. Right. So that's very interesting now, because this whole notion of quantum mechanics applies to very small scales. Now we see that that's not the case. Well, of course, photons are
You know they're not massive systems or anything like that but already I think this starts showing that this division of what are the skills where quantum applies and where it's a different maybe in some senses as we first thought it would be. But well I mean what's very interesting is like as I mentioned before at the skills where satellites operate relativity kicks in again the proper time
of clocks measured on earth is different to the clocks that you said that are in a satellite so you have to take into account at least a gravitational redshift so this is like a special relativistic effect but more than that so that is something that I've been very interested in I have a whole series of papers that
Use quantum field theory in curved space time to describe the space time of the earth using, for example, the structural metric, which is can be applied to this case. And then you describe the photons and the quantum states that travel from earth to a satellite or between links in between different satellites.
As using quantum field theory in space time you can solve the equations and then construct wave packets and study how the. Let's say if you send a wave pack from earth to a satellite how would this be modified due to the curvature of the space time.
Under light so this is no longer just special relativity using gravitational redshift that was what people were using we show that if you use quantum field theory incur space time. You could actually go beyond that and really see how the curvature of space time affects the for example we wrote some of these papers and we said this is.
What the curvature how would it affect for example quantum teleportation or quantum cryptography and then you could turn things around and use the fact that these states are modified to actually estimate the.
The space time parameters of the earth using quantum metrology that's an area of interest and i've written a series of papers in that direction more or less trying to answer this sort of questions but you see this is these are experiments that already.
Are taking place and actually there was a group working in Germany that once the whole group came to visit mine because they had some results they were not understanding and they using just the gravitational redshift and they wanted to see if there was more to be understood from from our work.
So this is an instance where you do see that some interplay between quantum states and the space time of the earth, the experiments reach those scales, but there is very little apart from our work. I don't see that there's many more things or
Or the experiments actually, they take into account the gravitational redshift, but they still have to test this sort of things. Now, quantum field theory in curved space time has not been demonstrated in the experiment. Quantum field theory, yes, I mean, so many times that's what CERN and Fermilab and all of these experiments are about. But when you have gravity included,
It still needs to be demonstrated so some of these predictions that we make could start giving you some hints that quantum field theory in cursed place and let's say it's a it's a good theory for the scales it would be very nice to check that.
So for the audience member who's thinking, how does this work logistically? Do you have to petition for time from this satellite or do you have to ask the people who are in charge of the satellite to perform an experiment? How does it work? Well, I actually belong to a group that was sort of a consortium in which
They work together with the theoreticians, with the experimentalists, and the group sort of discussed about which would be things that would be interesting to study. So the theoreticians would say, well, we would like to test this theory. Let's say I had a colleague, Tim Ralph, who came up with a new theory that
We sort of work use quantum field theory in space time but when beyond that and take into account close time like curves and then he proposed an experiment and then the group found this. Interesting from a theoretical point of view but the important thing there was that the experimental list found it feasible to do the experiment and the experiment was done.
And the experiment didn't find evidence of this sort of new theory. But you see, that is the sort of thing that is great. That's the sort of thing you want to be doing that people are creative, come up with new ideas. Again, the circle cast it in language first, then in, you know, the language of theoretical physics, which is mathematics, make predictions, experimental is go test and they say, well,
Yes or no and then you go on. So I think that there are groups like that and usually also what we do is that we get together theoreticians with experimentalists and make a proposal that might or not get funded. Of course with space-based experiments is more complicated.
I have actually been approached by NASA a few times and they asked me, do you have an experiment that you think we could do? But the things I've been working on lately are more things that you could also test on earth. And then you need to justify the expense. But well, these, I mean, I did point out to these papers and I said, well, I think it would be great if you could test some of these. But I haven't heard like, oh, yes, we're doing it or anything like that yet.
Okay so now we go to the clocks question that you were asking me and the very small scales. So yes like you were saying quantum clocks are the most precise clocks that we have and actually that is what we use to you know distribute clocks in the planet and you need to synchronize very well computers and you know airplanes and all sort of things that we need a very you know
very precise ways of measuring time. And these are done by atomic clock. So, you know, very roughly, how would atomic clock work is that you have many atoms here, for example, strontium trapped in an electromagnetic potential. So the sample could be like atoms that are cold. So that means they move very little and they're within some sort of volume. So typically it's like a millimeter.
And so on. So the energy levels, the internal energy levels of atoms are very sharp. So let's say between the ground state and the excited state, the energy is very precise. So you can use this as a frequency standard that gives you like the ticks of the clock very precisely. So you shine a laser and you excite the atoms and so on. And well, that's more or less what you what you use.
So there was this beautiful experiment done many years ago by Dave Wineland who got the Nobel Prize for trapping irons in an iron trap. He did this experiment after in which he would take an atomic clock and then sort of put another one or just move his clock upwards. I'm not sure actually what he did.
But he could he demonstrated time dilation at thirty three centimeters so before we know we can see time dilation.
If we're in the earth and then in a satellite, we know that. But now he said, look at these scales of 33 centimeters, you can see time dilation already. And that time dilation is just due to the gravitational potential difference? Yes, due to the earth, just from the gravitational field of the of the earth. So basically, you're demonstrating that the space time is curved. Yes. No.
That's really amazing. These clocks are super precise. They have a systematic uncertainty. They can reach 10 to the minus 18. That means that the error is one part in 10 to the 18. That would be more or less
Like in years i used to have it here cuz i forget but the clock would lose precision one and once it would lose one second and some something like thirty billion years i have the number here exactly but i now lost it but more or less know that precise.
They are and that's what i was telling my my colleagues in general activity that found it funny that i wanted to measure this curvature things i said no look i mean these things are so precise you know that that is not unthinkable that we can actually measure general relativistic effects. Add very small scales so i was talking to patrick gill so he's a colleague of mine who works at the national physics laboratory.
So that is like the institution in the UK where they do all these with the metrology institute where they do all these standards of frequency and the different units and so on. So he's working with quantum clocks with Helen Margolis and so on. And I was telling them, you know what, soon you're going to have a problem because you're going to get the proper time at the bottom of your sample
with the proper time at the top is going to be different and he was saying like yeah but we're not too worried about this now and so in six months later exactly that happened two papers came out.
Showing that you know, they could see time dilation. Well first there was like this one centimeter and then even in one millimeter Wow So now if you think about the quantum clocks the clock in the atoms in the bottom see a proper time different from the atoms Super interesting, but okay still, you know People working clocks might not be that worried. When did this result come out? That must have been a couple of years ago
Okay, so fairly recently 2020s. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Wow. Maybe this is actually look, this is from 20 that this paper I put here is one of the papers and it says published in 2022. I think it might have been submitted in 2020 or 2021, but it was published very recently. Sure. It's still cutting edge. I see. So, okay, so it's not a problem as long as the atoms are independent.
Because then what you can do which is what we do with time dilation with GPS is like we know how that changes so we can theoretically correct for it and then you just that take that into account and you don't have a problem okay but now people want to make these clocks more precise and beat this one ten to the minus eighteen uncertainty by entangling the atoms.
Because we've showed in quantum metrology that if you have entangled atoms you get you know a precision instead of going like one over square root of and it's one over and it's called the heisenberg limit and this makes things much more precise. Okay so if you do that then you have a problem you then you you you you you you bang your head with quantum mechanics and general relativity being incompatible.
Why because what time are you going to use the proper time is going to be different in different heights and the shredding your equation on you know on the left hand side is like dndt an absolute time. So here you have a relative time different at each height so which time you wanna use okay so again the experimentalist they all were not worried about it at all events because we just use the time at the center of the trap.
That doesn't work that well and it's like a it's a patch but forget about it let's say maybe for what they want to do. It's good enough i don't know but from a theoretical point of view this is not the right thing to do.
But you're actually losing on the possibility of learning what we should be doing because this is really a very good example where you are at these stages where quantum mechanics and general relativity interplay but we don't have a theory to describe that experiment.
So what I was telling, I recently went and visited the group at NPL, at the National Physics Laboratory, and I was having a little discussion about this. And I was telling them that we don't have experiments to address these questions. I know you're having an experiment that actually is getting there. So let's use this experiment.
Who to try so you have a theory that's good the theory is that you're using is that you say well i can more or less do with taking the proper time at the center of my. You know of my sample. What if you if you want to be rigorous really what you have is that you lost your notion of.
Time of clock time and you need to come up with a new thing but that is what opens the the opportunity of you know you you came up with a theory which is not very good i think which is measuring at the center well you mentioned theoretical problems but it sounds like what you're describing is more akin to missed opportunities for probing
the interaction of general relativity with quantum theory.
What is wrong is the theory that we're using to describe your experiment, but you need to start somewhere again, the little circle that we talked about. So I start with a theory that's not very good. Then you do the experiment. We looked at the experimental results and then I come up with a way of modifying my theory. Yeah. So right now I have a PhD student working on this project on this problem that I like very much.
And we've made some progress before, not with atoms but with light. I want to show you more or less what we did before. So Einstein came up with this idea of the Einstein light clock. Extra value meals are back. That means 10 tender juicy McNuggets and medium fries and a drink are just $8 only at McDonald's. For limited time only. Prices and participation may vary. Prices may be higher in Hawaii, Alaska and California and for delivery.
So he basically he used this clock this idea of a clock to argue things for relativity and so on so he considered two mirrors and then a photon bouncing back and forth and that gave you like the ticking of the clock and then he talked about what happens if you move this clock and so on.
But now we can use quantum field theory and quantum optics to quantize the idea of Einstein's clock. So I've done that. I wrote another series of papers in that direction is to say, okay, now I have two mirrors, but I have a quantum electromagnetic field inside.
So I get like, when you do that, you get sort of the field that you can write down as an infinite sum of different modes. So those are like states that are sharp in frequency, but the photons are completely delocalized in your box. But you can use quantum field theory to describe that. So that was also like a long journey because when I started to work with that, you could only do this in flat space.
And the only motion that people could describe was a sinusoidal motion of the walls and this was like the dynamical casimir effect but i wanted to do more than that i wanted to consider her space from the earth to a planet and send the little box up to study how.
The curvature the underlying curvature of the earth would affect the quantum clock or how would like an interplay of quantum states with time dilation would look like and all that sort of thing and gosh that was really really hard because i'm solving those equations was very complicated.
What allowed me to make progress was working with a colleague in nottingham where i used to work who is an expert in quantum field theory and curved space time and then we managed to come up with a new methodology where we could now start solving those sort of problems.
In a more general way and then i had a student and a postdoc and that helped me generalize this to curve space and so on and then so we've been now we have a clock model which is basically einstein's light like clock but with a quantum field we fix a frequency and the oscillations of the quantum states of this frequency mode give you like the ticking of the clock
But now we can move that into space and ask questions about the interplay of time dilation with quantum things. And we found some interesting things like when you move the clock due to things like called the dynamical Casimir effect, you create particles like photons inside the clock and these affect time dilation. Interesting. So it's kind of fun doing that.
I don't think you go to the very fundamental questions by doing it, but you start learning certain things. One of the things I was interested in is that if you use these clocks to measure space and time or time dilation and so on, because the state of the field is a quantum field,
Then you start getting into these uncertainty principles of things that you can actually not measure space and time with infinite precision like if you measure. Time very precisely then space is not and this sort of thing so i wanted to explore more the let's say.
The constraints that you get by in measuring space time by using a quantum system. Usually when people speak about Heisenberg's uncertainty, they're talking about position and momentum and you're talking about space and time. Well, I mean, you could well, yeah, no, they don't go together. No. So you have energy and time and then momentum and position. Yes.
But in these clocks you have an interplay of things. You have states that obey minimum uncertainty in space and momentum, so they're called Gaussian states, coherent states, and then we move these in space and then you have constraints that come also from the energy and the time.
so i didn't kind of go into much detail i wasn't very precise when i when i said that but you started getting the role of the different uncertainty principles that you get from quantum theory you know playing a role in how well your clock works and things like that which is very interesting cool this work goes back to 2014 yeah so
I'll leave a link to all the articles that have been mentioned in this talk, either visually or just audibly in the description. So people, if you're interested, you can read more. Yes, this is how we got started. So this first paper was in flat space. But now, like, I think I think have this is the latest paper that was published about clocks that was published in in 2023. There we can now since we managed to
Let's say generalize our techniques to include curved space time. I mean, it sounds simple, but literally it took us more than 15 years to be able to do that. And yeah, we're using quantum field theory in curved space time.
So then we finally had some theoretical methodologies that allow us to address that question and what we did is like we looked at a clock, a light clock, but we now were able to describe the clock in the space time of the earth, treating the space time of the earth like with a structural metric, and come up with a model of a clock and discuss how the clock ticks.
And you know talk about the radius of the earth and how does this show up in the face of the clock and so on so that was like an interesting we then came up with a notion of clock time already in this clock at each slice within the clock the proper time is different.
And we said okay but you could still build a clock by looking at the collective oscillations and that gave me an idea that okay now maybe we can go back to the atoms and redefine the notion of the clock time using the collective oscillations and so on but this is a student of mine is working on that and
We don't, you know, we're just starting like we don't really have much to say about the atomic case yet. Alright. Okay. So now the last thing I want to talk about with respect to these experiments is mass.
So yeah, I was telling you how Roger proposed many years ago that if you have a massive superposition, this is unstable. And he argued that by showing that there was a conflict between the superposition principle and the equivalence principle.
So he said yes you could have a superposition of a massive system that for him this would already be quantum gravity because you have a gravitational field in a superposition of two different configurations but these are unstable and they decay very quickly and that is why we don't see superposition in the classical world. So what kind of masses would you need to you know,
In order to see if the predictions of Roger are correct or not. Do you mind briefly outlining why is it that the superposition contradicts the equivalence principle or the strong equivalence principle? Yes, so he starts by describing a mass that is in a superposition that is falling.
And then he says, okay, if you describe this situation from a Newtonian point of view, and he writes like the wave function and now from an Einsteinian point of view, and he writes like a different equation. So he says this way functions have to be the same up to a face.
No, because in quantum theory states wave functions are equivalent up to a phase. So, but you see his whole argument, I actually I'm going to show you a paper that I wrote with Roger in the next slide. And in that paper, we write an introduction where we go through Roger's arguments, but they're not necessarily simple.
And one of the reasons why is because we don't have a theory for that. So Roger makes arguments that are like good arguments, well informed, but without actually having a theory. So sometimes the arguments are talking about quantum field theory in curved space time. And then he might make a Newtonian approximation and so on. But then he shows that the Einsteinian point of view is different from the Newtonian point of view.
And that there is a contradiction there and that then because of that he argues that these super positions should be short lived and he goes beyond that because he gives you a formula that measures sort of the error.
And this gives you an energy uncertainty, and it's related to the gravitational self energy of the difference in the superposition. So you take some maybe that is maybe going more technical, but we can if you if you if you want to, because I know that your followers are quite well educated in physics. So let me jump and then I come back.
a little bit here. This is the paper that I mentioned that, that I wrote with Roger. And what we did in this paper is that we calculated, you know, how massive with these super positions had to be if we use the Bose-Seinstein condensate, I'm going to come back to that. But we found that you need at least something like 10 to the nine atoms.
In a superposition and let me tell you where the field is now. So well, people started to put electrons in a superposition of two different locations using like a double slit experiment. I don't know already. I don't know. Maybe 90 years ago, I don't remember when was the first experiment with electrons. And from there they said, okay, it works for electrons. Amazing. Let's do it now with the atoms. And you know, then it's like how bigger can the states
The system gets and the record is on hold by marcus arms group in the university of vienna as well and where he has been able to put a big molecules in a superposition and by big i mean the molecules have around two thousand atoms. Wow but you know for gravity to act you need at least ten to the nine actually for molecules you need even more.
So you can see we're very far from that. What do you mean for gravity to act? I thought the assumption is that gravity acts as long as you have mass. Don't these have masses? Yes, but these are stable superpositions. Oh, according to the calculation from Penrose? Yes. Well, Marcus showed that you can have these superpositions and I think they lasted milliseconds. I don't exactly remember how long he had them for.
So they are stable for that long in the lab. So gravity is not causing the collapse of superpositions at those scales. I see, I see. But now the question is, is Roger right? Because if Roger is right, then that explains why we don't see superpositions in the macroscopic world.
And what would be super interesting is to see that no, that is a big open question in fundamental quantum mechanics is to understand what takes you from quantum states being in super positions to the classical world where we don't see quantum super positions. It's a very interesting question. Marcus and many other people are trying to address this question in an experimental point of view from the experiment by building like trying to put more mass into the super positions.
There are many different experiments going on at the moment and they use, for example, nano particles, nano beads made of silicon or silica, diamonds, little mirrors, roads, even membranes. There's many, many experiments going on. And also a record has been held by Marcus Aspenmeyer also in Vienna. So I spent three years in Vienna because of these amazing
People and experiments there so i was very lucky to get a visiting professorship for that long and and you know be in the same environment where where these amazing scientists are and so marcus was able to bring one of these nanobits to the quantum regime by cooling it down to lower vibrational
states so they're already in the quantum let's say scales but with 10 to the 8 atomic masses so quite a big beat but he cannot put them yet into a superposition of two different locations.
That has not been possible also one of my colleagues and i'm in southampton so one of my colleagues there and hendrick old bridge also has a very recent amazing paper where he takes these little beads and he manages to measure gravity. This is all classical.
But anyway, I mean at those scales where where quantum starts to kick in. Well, what he wants to do is push these experiments so that maybe he sees some quantum gravity and still far from that. But right, let's say approaching. But this is where things are at with respect to the experiments with big mass.
What I did with Roger is that when he started to tell me about his proposal and the experiments that people were doing, I noticed that all of these experiments were using solids, mirrors, beads and so on, and it's very difficult to cool a solid to the
To very cold temperatures where you have little noise so they haven't been able to to to make more progress noise because you can't cool them enough.
Like the coldest things that we can do and you can get up to ten to the atoms i mean that's not very common but there's been an experiment using hydrogen in which they could tend to the ten atoms into a condensate so let me tell you a little bit what the condensate is so you have a let's say when you learn quantum mechanics you learn that if you put a particle in a potential.
What the particle is there moving in the in the potential but if you call it to the ground state it will let's say if you manage to the ground state the the atom will be completely the localized within the potential.
So you don't know what the position of the atom is in that whole thing. No, that's really, I don't know when I did that in quantum mechanics. I loved it. Now think about having 10 to the eight, 10 to the 10 atoms, all cool down. But atoms are bosons so they can all occupy the same quantum state. So you can cool them all down to the ground state. And that is what is called a Bose Einstein condensate. So you have
The biggest system that behaves in a quantum mechanical way. And like I said in the experiment, people have been able to call these systems to have a nano Kelvin. Right. So I was wondering if then this would be a good system to test Roger's predictions. And that's what we did together. We said, okay, how would it go with a Bose-Einstein condensate? And well,
Also super complicated because you would have to create a super position of all the atoms on the left with all the atoms on the right and although the temperatures are that low. People have not been able to create the super positions are called new states because you have and zero zero and yes cool and you know what the record is by one of my colleagues call chris westbrook and he's been able to do two atoms.
like so you can have many like you can have up to 10 to the like you can have many atoms in quantum states in a boson condensate but not many atoms in a spatial superposition of two different space locations that's where gravity acts so this is what i now have been working on in the last two years and well it's
It's not related to it's inspired by this work with roger but it's a complete new thing i hope i can talk about it at a later time with you but in that previous paper with roger you know we started things like roger had given formulas for uniform spheres and in a bc you could have pancakes or elongated bcs with different
Distributions of the density and we studied if these would enhance the effects predicted by Roger and then well you have a lot of losses and we studied the losses and so on and that's how we came up with this. Well with a BC you need at least 10 to the 9 particles maybe even 10 to the 10 in order to start being able to actually verify that
The energy uncertainty of gravitational origin that Roger predicts has an effect. So now I'm going to finish this part with the slides just telling you of an example of the work that I've done where I brought together quantum field theory and curved space time to let's say propose a new sensor.
and um it it was quite bold because i came up with a proposal that you could use a Bose-Einstein condensate so let's say that the sample itself can be 100 micrometers 50 micrometers the the cloud of atoms sure and the experiment is again a tabletop experiment we could put it in this room no cool and i claim that you could use
The bc because you see an atom you we saw how precise they are and a bc you might want to see it as 10 to the eight atoms cool down to the ground state so this is a very precise it's a it's a system that is very sensitive to space time distortions and i made a proposal on how could you use the system to detect gravitational waves wow.
quite crazy because gravitational waves are detected in LIGO where the apparatus measures you know each arm three kilometers so this is very bold and I've been like really kind of when I met Roger that was in 2017 I was really invested in that and trying to convince you know the community that
You need to do this experiment because it's really opens up a new direction. And Roger was trying to convince me to work on the collapse of the wave function due to gravity. I was very reluctant because I thought, no, no, I want, you know, I want to put my time and my energy into these. And well, after the years, Roger managed to pull me more into what he's doing.
But yeah, so well, when you talk about using atoms to measure gravity, what we usually do in quantum technologies is an atom interferometer. So let's say you have a atom and you hit it with a laser with a photon and you make the atom, you put it in a superposition of two different positions, but they're free falling.
So they follow different trajectories and then you recombine them with lasers and they recombine at a point. But because they went through different trajectories, they pick information in a phase that depends on the local gravitational field. And this is what a quantum gravimeter is interesting. And I put here a single particle detector because although they throw maybe 10 to the six atoms at once into the interferometer, they all the atoms are independent.
and each atom goes through this superposition of trajectories and then they interfere at a point so i put here the interference is local because it's at the point where they recombine and then this is limited by the time of flight and the equation is very simple it's just this equation that's here basically depends with the time of flight squared which means the bigger the detector
The more precise it is that's why ligo is so big and they're thinking because they want to go to what i was with light but the principal is the same they now want to make a bigger detector in space called lisa to have more precision so i'm not in physics the tendency is to go very big.
Big experiments, of course, are very expensive. And I, my, my husband says that I'm a rebel, like, you know, everybody's doing one thing, I always want to do something different that applies to everything in my life. Yeah, that's another aspect that unifies us.
Yeah, no, it's like a contrarian at heart. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Exactly. So if everybody wants to be make big detected, I want to make them very small. So on. But it has paid off for me in science. Maybe sometimes in life can make me like a Grinch in Christmas and things like that. So I was like, Oh, I don't want to do what everybody does. So socially, I don't want to go to the movie that everybody's watching. But in science, it's been it's been interesting. Yeah, it's been good, you know. So
So, well, here I also write that this is compatible with Newtonian gravity, because this is an experiment that is described with the Schrodinger equation. And if you treat the local gravitational field by Newtonian gravity, everything works very nicely. And like I said, these are already commercial. My colleague, Philippe Boyer, has founded a company that he now sold called Mukens and there are other like Mark Kasevich does that as well.
You cannot make them smaller than that because then you lose precision.
And so if you wanted to get atom interferometer to apply them to fundamental physics to learn about the equivalence principle or to measure anything respect to gravity. So you want to make them more precise. You have to make them bigger. So Philippe Boyer did this amazing experiment in which he put his atom interferometer in a plane. So he flew the plane as well and let it free fall for a bit to get the long baselines.
He also has an amazing experiment on the ground called, oh gosh, I forgot the name of it now, but it is like the arms of the Atom Interferometer are 300 meters long, so this is huge. You can see here sort of the tunnels and so on. And in Germany you have a drop tower
I'm that is like always like this like drop tower address yesterday they put up a drop tower they put up there like an atom interferometer and then they let it drop to get these long interferometer arms and be able to be more precise.
Some other people also look at these atom interferometry and put lasers and slow down the atoms so that they get, so for example this paper by Guillermino Tino is really beautiful, trying to miniaturize the detectors.
So, um, so what I came up with, with this idea was, well, if you're trying to do interferometry in using these sort of call it spatial interferometry, because the atom goes through two different positions, the precision is going to be limited by how big it is. So you are going to have to make them bigger to be more precise. But if instead of that, we do interferometry, not in space, but in frequency,
Then what is going to limit your precision is time. So the states, so the sensor can be very small, but you're going to have to produce quantum states that live longer in time. So with this idea that I called frequency interferometry, I came up with a number of sensors and including the gravitational wave detector.
And then I applied it to searches for dark energy, searches for dark matter. I also patent an idea on how to use these states to measure the local gravitational field. So this might have commercial applications in the future. And I like that because I like more fundamental questions. Actually, my favorite question is like, what's the nature of reality? What are we doing here? What am I? It's a dangerous question, huh? Yeah, very.
All of these things but when you're doing that and you find some interesting things why not also come up with something that can be patented and commercialized and so on. When I met Roger I was really invested in this and I'm still working on it. I have some recent results.
One of them is not it was in the old in the old size it doesn't matter but i think i think i managed to give you a flavor of what you can do by bringing together quantum technologies and apply them to fundamental quick questions and where things are at i think i want to finish by by saying that this last proposal is an example where we used
Not quantum mechanics, but let's say a more fundamental theory because it takes into account relativity, which is quantum field theory in curved space time. And although it's not the finished theory because it cannot address the question of super positions of mass.
You can apply it without problem to specific cases like the propagation of space-time of packages in the space-time of the earth and many other interesting instances. This allows you to come up with let's say new sensors and the theoretical predictions that we've made is that these sensors are so in principle they still have to test them.
So precise that you might be able to detect a gravitational wave with a tiny system and that these are for high frequencies by the way they don't really compete with like go because like go. Works in a different frequency regime this would be for frequencies higher than the ones that like go detect. But you know you know.
Let's say using these patches of the theory that incorporate relativity, I think already show you that you can in principle make sensors that allow you to go closer to these scales where I was talking about that we don't have the guide to unify.
You know when people were trying to detect gravitational waves, the first apparatus that were built in Maryland, you can still see them, they're these Weber bars. So people predicted, Weber predicted that these, the phonons, so the vibrational modes of these big metallic bars would resonate with gravitational waves and then he claimed that he actually had detected one and then this got sort of controversial and then eventually disproved.
Actually the proposal that we made in which you have you can implement it by using a bc.
I'm using the vibration of most like the phone on modes of the bc but because you can call the bc to have a nano calving this is ten orders of magnitude cooler than the weather bars were cool initially then and you can prepare the phone in a highly quantum state which you cannot do unless you go to those cold temperatures and then you can exploit all the sensitivities that we were talking about quantum technologies to
see changes in the space time. And that's how we came up with that proposal. You know, like, I think I can talk forever. So maybe it's good to leave it here. I think let me let's see if I had like some kind of concluding. Well, yes, my concluding side was to say that I've managed to raise funding to build a new experiment. So I'm working with Chris
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Professor, thank you so much. You've given far more than just a flavor. I lost count of how many pioneering ideas there are here with actual practical consequences in the near term, near term being within a couple of years. I don't recall the last time that's happened on on this channel. And all I do is interview people that are at the bleeding edge in their field. So thank you for that. Thanks.
Yeah, thank you. It's a big pleasure for me to be on your channel. The pleasure is all mine. Thank you. Great, thanks. Also, thank you to our partner, The Economist.
Firstly, thank you for watching, thank you for listening. There's now a website, curtjymungle.org, and that has a mailing list. The reason being that large platforms like YouTube, like Patreon, they can disable you for whatever reason, whenever they like.
That's just part of the terms of service. Now, a direct mailing list ensures that I have an untrammeled communication with you. Plus, soon I'll be releasing a one-page PDF of my top 10 toes. It's not as Quentin Tarantino as it sounds like. Secondly, if you haven't subscribed or clicked that like button, now is the time to do so. Why? Because each subscribe, each like helps YouTube push this content to more people
I also found out last year that external links count plenty toward the algorithm, which means that whenever you share on Twitter, say on Facebook or even on Reddit, etc., it shows YouTube, hey, people are talking about this content outside of YouTube, which in turn
Thirdly, there's a remarkably active Discord and subreddit for theories of everything where people explicate toes, they disagree respectfully about theories, and build as a community our own toe. Links to both are in the description. Fourthly, you should know this podcast is on iTunes, it's on Spotify, it's on all of the audio platforms.
All you have
This is
You also get early access to ad free episodes, whether it's audio or video, it's audio in the case of Patreon, video in the case of YouTube. For instance, this episode that you're listening to right now was released a few days earlier. Every dollar helps far more than you think. Either way, your viewership is generosity enough. Thank you so much.
Think Verizon, the best 5G network, is expensive? Think again. Bring in your AT&T or T-Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal. Now what to do with your unwanted bills? Ever seen an origami version of the Miami Bull?
Jokes aside, Verizon has the most ways to save on phones and plans where you can get a single line with everything you need. So bring in your bill to your local Miami Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal.
▶ View Full JSON Data (Word-Level Timestamps)
{
"source": "transcribe.metaboat.io",
"workspace_id": "AXs1igz",
"job_seq": 4793,
"audio_duration_seconds": 6288.61,
"completed_at": "2025-11-30T23:20:59Z",
"segments": [
{
"end_time": 26.203,
"index": 0,
"start_time": 0.009,
"text": " The Economist covers math, physics, philosophy, and AI in a manner that shows how different countries perceive developments and how they impact markets. They recently published a piece on China's new neutrino detector. They cover extending life via mitochondrial transplants, creating an entirely new field of medicine. But it's also not just science, they analyze culture, they analyze finance, economics, business, international affairs across every region."
},
{
"end_time": 53.234,
"index": 1,
"start_time": 26.203,
"text": " I'm particularly liking their new insider feature was just launched this month it gives you gives me a front row access to the economist internal editorial debates where senior editors argue through the news with world leaders and policy makers and twice weekly long format shows basically an extremely high quality podcast whether it's scientific innovation or shifting global politics the economist provides comprehensive coverage beyond headlines."
},
{
"end_time": 64.514,
"index": 2,
"start_time": 53.558,
"text": " As a TOE listener, you get a special discount. Head over to economist.com slash TOE to subscribe. That's economist.com slash TOE for your discount."
},
{
"end_time": 93.439,
"index": 3,
"start_time": 66.886,
"text": " Hola, Miami! When's the last time you've been in Burlington? We've updated, organized, and added fresh fashion. See for yourself Friday, November 14th to Sunday, November 16th at our Big Deal event. You can enter for a chance to win free wawa gas for a year, plus more surprises in your Burlington. Miami, that means so many ways and days to save. Burlington. Deals. Brands. Wow! No purchase necessary. Visit bigdealevent.com for more details."
},
{
"end_time": 107.432,
"index": 4,
"start_time": 94.377,
"text": " When Galileo invented the telescope, people didn't want to look through it. And that also makes me think about a lot of the stuff happening in science where people refuse to look at certain theories."
},
{
"end_time": 132.995,
"index": 5,
"start_time": 108.626,
"text": " For decades, reconciling quantum theory with gravity has been the holy grail of theoretical physics. But what if the path forward isn't through ever more convoluted mathematics, but rather through ingenious experiments we could perform right now? Professor Yvette Fuentes, the close collaborator of Roger Penrose, is proposing just that."
},
{
"end_time": 152.244,
"index": 6,
"start_time": 133.404,
"text": " groundbreaking tests using ultra-cold atoms and quantum technologies that could probe the ostensibly quantum nature of space-time. Yet, despite its potential, many researchers in the field are hesitant to pursue these ideas. Is it the allure of purely theoretical work?"
},
{
"end_time": 170.128,
"index": 7,
"start_time": 152.602,
"text": " the inertia of established research programs, or simply the challenge of breaking away from fashionable thinking. In this episode, we'll explore Professor Fuentes' inventive approaches to testing quantum gravity and why they're being overlooked by much of the physics community."
},
{
"end_time": 189.77,
"index": 8,
"start_time": 174.77,
"text": " Professor Yvette Fuentes, it's a long time coming. I'm super excited to have you on here. The audience, it's going to be a treat for them. They don't realize it right now, maybe, but the audience is in for a great treat. So thank you. And the floor is yours."
},
{
"end_time": 216.203,
"index": 9,
"start_time": 190.162,
"text": " Thank you very much. I was just telling you just now that I love your podcast and I listen to it, see it very often, let's say. So it was very nice meeting you just now because I felt that I've met you forever. So this feeling of after seeing you often in the evenings and then it's like, oh, well, that's, that's you there. So that was really very nice."
},
{
"end_time": 246.305,
"index": 10,
"start_time": 216.596,
"text": " I was also telling you just now that I saw some of the podcasts that you were talking about string theory. Physics is like whack-a-mole. Einstein said, I have this idea, acceleration and gravity are the same. Problem, how do I make this work with a scalar field? So that's like a little mole that comes up. He whacks it down. He says, okay, maybe it was a mistake to unite space and time. But then problem crops up. You have to introduce a variable speed of light."
},
{
"end_time": 276.118,
"index": 11,
"start_time": 246.578,
"text": " So then he's like, okay, let me knock that down. Forget about scalars. Let me introduce tensors, a different mathematical object. You knock that down. In order for string theory to work, it needs to be 26 dimensional. And it only had bosons at this point in the story. Okay, why don't we add something called supersymmetry? So we knock it down. Okay, cool. Problem. There's still many types of string theory. And now there's 10 dimensional, not four dimensional, but it's some progress. Okay, solution. You combine some heterotic strings. Okay, problem. We still have five and we have gauge anomalies."
},
{
"end_time": 302.824,
"index": 12,
"start_time": 277.142,
"text": " and how when one works in foundations of physics and in unification there's like that I think you mentioned the that people say it's like the only game in town and how there is this sort of social pressure to work in in the field. So I am working at the moment in the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity"
},
{
"end_time": 321.903,
"index": 13,
"start_time": 302.824,
"text": " Like this is kind of really focusing on on that problem is a more recent thing. I still don't have actually my my results available but they're coming up of course not the full thing but i think a nice interesting step i think we managed to achieve."
},
{
"end_time": 347.295,
"index": 14,
"start_time": 322.261,
"text": " but I come from a very different sort of place and I thought that maybe the story of that could be interesting in the light of the things you've been discussing. Yes and I've been looking at your research in the evenings as well and so this is a wonderful experience for myself and I would love for the audience to get familiar with you so please go over your recent results."
},
{
"end_time": 370.555,
"index": 15,
"start_time": 348.302,
"text": " Yes, so I became interested in the foundations of physics as a student at university. I had a teacher, Luis de la Peña, who I enjoyed. He was teaching me quantum mechanics and I particularly like his class because he talked a lot about interpretations of quantum mechanics."
},
{
"end_time": 390.998,
"index": 16,
"start_time": 371.203,
"text": " I was really fascinated with that he was very generous because at some point i approach him and i said you know i want to work with you on this topic and he said you know what it's been very difficult for me it's been a really difficult path and i don't want that for you."
},
{
"end_time": 420.384,
"index": 17,
"start_time": 391.408,
"text": " so i would suggest work on something more sort of mainstream and if you're still interested when when you're grown up let's say you can come back and i think that is somehow related to what what you're saying that he took a different path and he found it extremely difficult and he wanted to spare me of that i think he could have just said yes great you know a good student come and work with me and instead of that he i think he was very generous by by saying that"
},
{
"end_time": 447.449,
"index": 18,
"start_time": 420.896,
"text": " So, um, uh, I think, well, what, what, I approached him also because I wanted to go to Fermilab. There was like the possibility, a competition to go and spend the summer there. And, um, and I asked him for a reference letter and he said, why would I give you a reference letter? And I said, well, because, you know, I got like A's in all your classes. He said, well, many students do that. And then from there, we just went on talking."
},
{
"end_time": 468.404,
"index": 19,
"start_time": 448.029,
"text": " What I told him was that I was finishing my degree and starting to see what I wanted to do. I mentioned to him that all of my classmates that were interested in theory were actually going into string theory."
},
{
"end_time": 498.916,
"index": 20,
"start_time": 469.565,
"text": " And that I actually, when I learned about a string theory, like all of my classmates, I was absolutely fascinated with it. I think it's a beautiful idea that we treat particles like point-like systems and then the idea that there is another dimension or more dimensions, there are strings and how you could unify the notion of different particles in this way is beautiful and I loved it. But then once I got more into it,"
},
{
"end_time": 525.077,
"index": 21,
"start_time": 499.462,
"text": " and you know sort of issues started to pop out especially the many dimensions then I thought this reminds me of the epicycles and let me explain you know what I meant so I'm sure that most of people in the audience are familiar with this but back in the time people wanted to describe the trajectories of planets"
},
{
"end_time": 554.514,
"index": 22,
"start_time": 526.049,
"text": " But back then people used to think that they had to follow nature had to follow circles because circles is the perfect figure is a shape. It's really interesting how we get into these ideas and we get so stuck in them. Right. And those are the ones that don't let us make progress. So we can come back to that maybe later because we've been trying to unify quantum mechanics in general relativity."
},
{
"end_time": 578.933,
"index": 23,
"start_time": 555.077,
"text": " for more than a hundred years and we're probably stuck with something equivalent to the to the perfect figure and we're unwilling to let go of that and maybe we can talk about later about that because i there's like some some ideas actually i i think that maybe even consciousness could be sort of something missing"
},
{
"end_time": 603.234,
"index": 24,
"start_time": 579.548,
"text": " In the equation, let's say. Oh, yeah. So if you try to describe the trajectory of a planet using circles, well, first one was not possible. People said, I remember I also heard you talk about how you get a problem and boom, you bang it and you fix it. And then another one comes out and you bang it in. No. So right, right. The whack-a-mole. Exactly."
},
{
"end_time": 628.66,
"index": 25,
"start_time": 603.592,
"text": " Yes so you do that with the circles and okay you add another circle and that doesn't work that well so you add another one and well back then people used to need something like 600 circles to more or less describe the trajectory of a planet and then came Kepler and says they're not circles they're ellipses and boom"
},
{
"end_time": 649.94,
"index": 26,
"start_time": 629.087,
"text": " No more necessary to hit things with a hammer anymore. It just falls in everything beautifully, right? So when I heard about, when I looked into string theory with a bit more detail, not much, I very soon felt this reminds me of the epicycles. It can't be right."
},
{
"end_time": 677.773,
"index": 27,
"start_time": 650.742,
"text": " And I told that to my teacher, to Luis de la Peña, and he smiled and he said, I'm going to give you the reference letter where you want to go. That's interesting. What was it specifically about what you said that changed his mind? Well, I think he liked that I was so, in a way, critical of string theory and that I was not going where everybody else was going, because I just had a feeling this is not right."
},
{
"end_time": 705.964,
"index": 28,
"start_time": 678.558,
"text": " Now, didn't he mean to go into string theory when he said that you should go into physics in a more mainstream manner? No, and then let me tell you what that is, because that was another important point. When I was finishing my degree, I think also, like many students, I was also sort of in love with astronomy. That's always like many students go also in that direction, because it's just so attractive. And I did an undergraduate thesis on Seaford galaxies."
},
{
"end_time": 729.258,
"index": 29,
"start_time": 706.698,
"text": " and i enjoyed that very much but after my work and i even my first paper is on seaford galaxies i thought well i could spend the rest of my life studying these beautiful objects but something is missing i didn't have it sort of very i was so aware of of it like i'm now but what was missing for me was that"
},
{
"end_time": 738.046,
"index": 30,
"start_time": 729.616,
"text": " Studying these beautiful objects, I felt were not really bringing me to the point of asking questions like what is the fabric of reality?"
},
{
"end_time": 767.295,
"index": 31,
"start_time": 738.507,
"text": " Something was missing, not with the galactic data, but with what even the most ideal answer to any astronomical question could provide to the foundational aspects of the questions at your heart. Yes, somehow I felt like studying. I could spend my whole life studying safer galaxies and that would probably be a lot of fun. I already had a really good paper with a letter and everything."
},
{
"end_time": 792.619,
"index": 32,
"start_time": 767.295,
"text": " But i felt like i'm not gonna be able if i go in that direction to to really focus on the questions that i'm really interested in. I see and i guess you know like i was i was more interested in understanding sort of more foundational questions like deeper what is reality about. So i was in the in the cafeteria."
},
{
"end_time": 820.435,
"index": 33,
"start_time": 793.251,
"text": " at the university and suddenly a colleague of mine, I'm still working with him, Pablo Barberis, ran into the cafeteria when I was doing my homework and he said, they demonstrated quantum teleportation. And I was like, what? That was Anton Silinger's experiment. But then it would play a role in my life as well, because I ended up being a professor, a visiting professor in Vienna within that group for three years."
},
{
"end_time": 837.312,
"index": 34,
"start_time": 820.845,
"text": " But well back then it was like oh some people in Europe demonstrated quantum teleportation and also told me you know what they also managed to trap single particles single atoms in an iron trap and in a cavity."
},
{
"end_time": 865.794,
"index": 35,
"start_time": 838.012,
"text": " And I remember my teacher, Luis de la Pena, used to say quantum mechanics is a theory that doesn't apply to single particles in experiments. We're always doing experiments with an ensemble and many particles and stuff like that. So then when I heard that, I said, OK, that area is going to get super interesting because if now they can do experiments with single atoms, we will be able to address some of these fundamental questions."
},
{
"end_time": 887.176,
"index": 36,
"start_time": 866.271,
"text": " And that's where I thought, okay, that's the right thing to do. So when we had already a little bit talked to Luis about that. And when I told him, you know, what about quantum optics? He said, that's excellent. So I went to Imperial College to work in the group of Peter Knight."
},
{
"end_time": 913.2,
"index": 37,
"start_time": 888.285,
"text": " and when I arrived well with the idea of doing quantum optics and when I arrived there everybody was working on quantum information and entanglement measures and so on so I end up doing a PhD in let's say in the interface of quantum optics and quantum information that went really well I did I did very well and then from there I went to do a postdoc at the perimeter institute"
},
{
"end_time": 941.834,
"index": 38,
"start_time": 913.49,
"text": " yes my neighbor yeah yes exactly you're in toronto right when i arrived there was really exciting because i think i was the first or the second postdoc to arrive there to work in quantum information cool the institute wasn't like established as it is now yet it was uh the building was like the old post office in waterloo i was it was so cool you we had like sofas and you know like a bar and and uh"
},
{
"end_time": 968.558,
"index": 39,
"start_time": 942.244,
"text": " and a blackboard and we sit like at home and you know it was really like a fantastic experience but when i got there there was one group in quantum information very small one and then there was string theory and quantum gravity and foundations of physics and i started to so we were such a small group i started to attend the seminars in"
},
{
"end_time": 990.23,
"index": 40,
"start_time": 968.78,
"text": " gravity and quantum field theory incurred space and i go very jealous i felt very jealous i thought like oh gosh i'm missing out on i'm missing out on something because you were in the quantum information section yeah yeah and and people in quantum information were talking about quantum cryptography the idea of quantum cryptography is beautiful but"
},
{
"end_time": 1002.108,
"index": 41,
"start_time": 990.674,
"text": " if you work on that then it's again like oh how do you make a hack and how do you fix it and again you get lost in those things and i was thinking no no no this is really not not for me"
},
{
"end_time": 1031.374,
"index": 42,
"start_time": 1002.295,
"text": " So I thought maybe I change and I work on general relativity, but I had already made a few jumps. No, I went from astrophysics, a paper there to quantum optics. And then I have a paper on quantum computing. What am I going to do? And I thought, well, maybe it's not a very good idea. And I started without knowing this was kind of a new thing. I started like the innocence as a young researcher, I started to mix them."
},
{
"end_time": 1059.94,
"index": 43,
"start_time": 1032.005,
"text": " So I wrote a paper that's called Alice falls into a black hole entanglement in non inertial frames. Okay. That really that's been, it's my most cited paper. Wow. And it really sort of opened a door for me, let's say in, in, in the scientific world, because you were also talking about how difficult it is and how competitive it is to get, you know, a name and known and, and, and opposition and so on."
},
{
"end_time": 1089.821,
"index": 44,
"start_time": 1060.845,
"text": " So what I did is that I applied what I had learned in Imperial College about measures of entanglement to quantum field theory in curved space-time and to eternal black holes and so on. And it was a very new thing to do. Now there is like a field more or less established in that direction that people call it relativistic quantum information. So I was having a great time working on that."
},
{
"end_time": 1118.933,
"index": 45,
"start_time": 1090.418,
"text": " But it was all very academic, you know, it's like, oh, entanglement in black holes and things like that. I still felt that I'm now getting lost in math and getting lost in math. When you say it was too academic, you mean too theoretical, removed from experimental underpinnings? Yes, exactly. Yes. And then I got into this idea that, you know what, I want to like bring this stuff"
},
{
"end_time": 1148.882,
"index": 46,
"start_time": 1119.275,
"text": " to a point where i can do an experiment i mean of course not me i'm a theoretician but propose an experiment so i hired a postdoc um his name is carlos who was someone doing theory but very close for experiments and he was working with superconducting circuits and stuff like that and it was really funny because i just thought i didn't even have a clear idea of how we would get there i just said this is where i want to go and we together started to work with quantum metrology"
},
{
"end_time": 1179.104,
"index": 47,
"start_time": 1149.36,
"text": " Applying it to quantum field theory in space time. So now that's going to go into my slides for the super long introduction. But I thought it was like irrelevant to what you were talking about recently. And I actually managed to start proposing experiments. Some of them at least partially have already been tested, you know, and like the experiment have been done. And that became sort of my path studying"
},
{
"end_time": 1207.312,
"index": 48,
"start_time": 1179.787,
"text": " Quantum and relativity, but really proposing experiments. I was not working in unification because I was working with quantum field theory in curved space time. So I'm going to tell you a little bit more about that in a, in a moment. And, and, and then by doing that, that finally brought me to, to an idea that is like my own inspired by the work of Roger Penrose, who I like, I talk to him very often."
},
{
"end_time": 1234.65,
"index": 49,
"start_time": 1207.705,
"text": " And then I, I managed to kind of come up with a theory that can be tested in the experiments and we're going to do that very soon. Cool. So that's the kind of the story and of, of why, you know, my talk, which is also about unification comes from a very different perspective comes from someone who's, you know, background is in quantum optics and quantum information."
},
{
"end_time": 1251.442,
"index": 50,
"start_time": 1235.265,
"text": " and looking at experiments and then sort of trying to see what can we learn from these theories and their interplay and try to make theories informed by the experiment."
},
{
"end_time": 1281.527,
"index": 51,
"start_time": 1251.971,
"text": " Wonderful. Thank you for that introduction. I have two quick questions. Maybe they're addressed in the talk itself, but so you were in firstly astrophysics, then you went to quantum information, then you saw some talks on general relativity and you thought maybe you want to go into that field, but you said it would be too much of a jump of you jumping back and forth. But would it be because astrophysics does it not already use general relativity? So how much of a jump would that be? It'd be like jumping backward rather than jumping to the side, no?"
},
{
"end_time": 1308.968,
"index": 52,
"start_time": 1281.817,
"text": " Well, it could have been a bit like jumping back, but the work that I was doing in astrophysics was not really related to general relativity directly. You know, it was more I was doing statistical studies on how companions of safer galaxies could trigger the material of the galaxy to go into the black hole and so on."
},
{
"end_time": 1336.681,
"index": 53,
"start_time": 1309.343,
"text": " Yeah, I guess because of the type of analysis that I was doing, it would have been like another jump. Okay, okay, cool. And then now you also mentioned that you work on quantum field theory and curved spacetime. Now, some people would see that as unification because general relativity has something to do with curved spacetime. So can you please delineate those two? Yes, actually, I'm going to do that in my slides. So I mean, but very quickly,"
},
{
"end_time": 1353.422,
"index": 54,
"start_time": 1337.09,
"text": " That's the beauty of quantum field theory in curved space-time is that it allows you to study some, let's say quantum effects and relativistic deflects they interplay in some scales, but it's not the full theory. It doesn't resolve actually what I think is the most interesting question."
},
{
"end_time": 1383.029,
"index": 55,
"start_time": 1354.292,
"text": " This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast? Smart move. Being financially savvy? Smart move. Another smart move? Having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling. Just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state."
},
{
"end_time": 1412.927,
"index": 56,
"start_time": 1383.814,
"text": " Um, so yeah, let me get started and I'm going to get there very, very soon. Wonderful. Take it away. The floor is yours. Okay. Thanks. So, um, well, uh, yeah, there, there are many fundamental questions, um, that, uh, are unanswered and very interesting ones. Um, and I wrote in this slide, just a few that I find fascinating and maybe some of them I work on as well. Um, so for example, what is the nature of dark matter?"
},
{
"end_time": 1436.135,
"index": 57,
"start_time": 1413.387,
"text": " That is a big one. So yeah, well, questions like is dark energy driving the accelerated expansion of the universe? What's the physics of the early, very early times and cosmology? Does the equivalence principle holds for quantum systems and so on? There's many, many interesting questions and fundamental questions, physics that don't have answers."
},
{
"end_time": 1462.944,
"index": 58,
"start_time": 1436.766,
"text": " And underpinning our difficulties to find answers to these questions is our difficulty actually to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity. I went to a conference a few years ago and it was all about how can we use quantum experiments for fundamental physics and many of these fundamental questions came up and then someone in the audience, a colleague of mine, got up"
},
{
"end_time": 1480.247,
"index": 59,
"start_time": 1463.166,
"text": " And said well but nobody's addressing you know kind of the elephant in the room what's the elephant in the room well that's you know we for more than a hundred years have tried to unify quantum physics and general relativity and incompatible."
},
{
"end_time": 1502.432,
"index": 60,
"start_time": 1480.896,
"text": " so how does that affect all these other interesting questions and then then that's where i think i felt yes that that is a really interesting question to to answer so this is like the very typical cube that one sees in theoretical physics but it's just you know a bit designed in a different way where you have"
},
{
"end_time": 1531.783,
"index": 61,
"start_time": 1502.432,
"text": " Relativity on one axis so that would be see the velocity of light then gravitation on another dimension that would be the gravitational constant and then quantum physics would be h bar. So this cube here i'm trying to show that well we have some pieces of the puzzle so they're parts of the theories that kind of some answer some of the questions or work well in some scales."
},
{
"end_time": 1558.78,
"index": 62,
"start_time": 1532.551,
"text": " So we have a lot of work done in the last years in different pieces of this puzzle, but we don't have the whole picture yet. So quantum field theory in curved space, I would say is like one of these big pieces of a puzzle, but it doesn't do the whole thing yet. So I'll go into why not in a moment."
},
{
"end_time": 1583.2,
"index": 63,
"start_time": 1559.138,
"text": " Okay so this actually title of this slide should we quantize gravity or gravitize quantum theory comes from Roger Pendrose and what he means by that is should we keep the principles of quantum theory and modify general relativity that's what we understand more by quantum gravity."
},
{
"end_time": 1611.305,
"index": 64,
"start_time": 1584.206,
"text": " Or should we do the contrary, keep the principles of general relativity and modify quantum theory? So I guess, you know, like most people working on the unification, maybe follow the first line of quantizing gravity. But Roger thinks differently, thinks that quantum theory has a problem anyways, which is the measurement problem."
},
{
"end_time": 1640.503,
"index": 65,
"start_time": 1611.681,
"text": " So he supports more, let's say the root of keeping the principles of general relativity and then trying to modify quantum theory to bring them together. Now we both agree that it's more likely you have to modify both of them. But let's say Roger would always give more priority to general relativity in that sense. So I was writing here in this slide like a few things."
},
{
"end_time": 1661.988,
"index": 66,
"start_time": 1641.237,
"text": " about both theories so let's go first to quantum theory like same as in classical physics time is absolute in quantum theory so clocks take at the same rate for any observer independent of its state of motion and this comes from"
},
{
"end_time": 1686.971,
"index": 67,
"start_time": 1662.261,
"text": " The theory being invariant under Galilean transformation. So the underpinning transformations are Galilean transformations just as in classical physics. So in the same note that inherits that space and time are very different notions. The Schrodinger equation treats space and time completely different. It has one derivative in time and two in x."
},
{
"end_time": 1717.739,
"index": 68,
"start_time": 1688.046,
"text": " It treats time like a parameter and then positions can be quantized and you use operators, which are completely different mathematical structures. So then already from there, they would be incompatible with the relativity. And just for some clarification, quantum theory means quantum mechanics and not quantum field theory. Yes. Yes. I guess because of my background, I use that more when I say I like to use actually more quantum physics."
},
{
"end_time": 1743.882,
"index": 69,
"start_time": 1718.712,
"text": " But that I'm just talking about like, you know, Schrodinger equation fields is like a step more, you know, yes. Well, then in quantum theory, we have the superposition principle. So particles can be in a superposition of two distinguishable locations at a time."
},
{
"end_time": 1765.06,
"index": 70,
"start_time": 1744.804,
"text": " And then, well, this is what Roger calls, well, many people call the measurement problem, but in quantum theory, the outcome of measurements is probabilistic, fundamentally probabilistic. And then when we want to measure, let's say, space or time, we have an uncertainty principle."
},
{
"end_time": 1791.698,
"index": 71,
"start_time": 1765.384,
"text": " That tells us that if you measure positions very precisely, then you cannot simultaneously measure momentum and so on. Also, it's kind of a bit of a summary of some of these, let's say, fundamental principles of the theory. Yes. Then on the other hand, in which way they're different and why are they incompatible? Well, in relativity, time and length"
},
{
"end_time": 1821.92,
"index": 72,
"start_time": 1792.193,
"text": " are not absolute, are observer dependent. So the underlying transformations in relativity are Lorentz transformations, and if you look at them, they mix space and time. So let's say the more radical thing I think that we learned from Einstein is that space and time are not different in the way that we understand them in classical physics, and also in our experience, right? If you tell anyone space and time are like"
},
{
"end_time": 1841.715,
"index": 73,
"start_time": 1822.312,
"text": " A bit of the same thing people would be shocked with that but that's what Einstein showed us that they actually belong together in a higher dimensional object which is space time and they're both dependent on the state of the observer."
},
{
"end_time": 1860.247,
"index": 74,
"start_time": 1842.278,
"text": " And then you have in relativity, if you have gravity, for example, it curves space time. And then if you look at two different points in space, you can see that time flows at different rates, at different points."
},
{
"end_time": 1876.578,
"index": 75,
"start_time": 1861.135,
"text": " So already there you can see that you have to treat space and time on an equal footing. So let's say equations if you have that you're having a second derivative in space you should also have a second derivative in time."
},
{
"end_time": 1896.8,
"index": 76,
"start_time": 1877.363,
"text": " So that you can already see how that is already incompatible with quantum theory. And so a little bit also the question of time is at the heart of our difficulties to unify the theory."
},
{
"end_time": 1912.568,
"index": 77,
"start_time": 1897.312,
"text": " And then you could think about things how would you see if a math is in a superposition of two different locations and then time flowing at different rates. I mean the Schrodinger equation has only like one derivative in time is one time."
},
{
"end_time": 1942.944,
"index": 78,
"start_time": 1913.422,
"text": " You cannot think about such questions yet with the theories that we have currently, no? Another thing, just to finish with the slides, like in relativity, we don't have this thing about the outcome of measurements being probabilistic, but it's a deterministic theory in that sense, and we can measure space and time as precise as we want."
},
{
"end_time": 1971.732,
"index": 79,
"start_time": 1943.183,
"text": " But well, in my opinion, the most interesting question that we have to answer is what happens when we have a massive superposition where the mass is in a superposition of two different locations in space. And this is something that you cannot answer with quantum field theory in curved space time, because, well, I'm going to go more into that later."
},
{
"end_time": 1982.773,
"index": 80,
"start_time": 1972.09,
"text": " But the theory assumes that you have sort of a fixed background, so a fixed space time metric, which is a solution of Einstein's equations."
},
{
"end_time": 2011.578,
"index": 81,
"start_time": 1982.91,
"text": " But the fields themselves or you know the mass itself doesn't curve it so you couldn't answer this question. I think this is really an interesting and important question because we know for example from the experiments that you can have the electromagnetic field in a superposition. So you can take an electron and put the electron in a superposition and then you can see that the quantum fields."
},
{
"end_time": 2040.111,
"index": 82,
"start_time": 2012.108,
"text": " generated are in quantum states so we were talking about quantum optics and quantum optics has been you know a theory that has been tested in many many experiments and we know that the electromagnetic field can be in quantum states and now the big question is can gravity also be in a quantum state in in in the sense and well"
},
{
"end_time": 2047.346,
"index": 83,
"start_time": 2040.776,
"text": " If the mass is very small, well yes, because the moment that we have, let's say, an atom in a superposition,"
},
{
"end_time": 2075.213,
"index": 84,
"start_time": 2047.79,
"text": " In a way, the gravitational field produced by the atom is also in a superposition, but I think the big question is more like if that's a stable situation or not. And that's where Roger, and I'm going to go more into detail of that, comes in and says, well, you can, but that is a very unstable situation and gravity collapses the wave function, which would then resolve the measurement problem."
},
{
"end_time": 2090.828,
"index": 85,
"start_time": 2075.606,
"text": " And that would explain more like the transition between the classical world and the quantum world that would explain why we don't see let's say this cop in a superposition of here and there and so on."
},
{
"end_time": 2121.288,
"index": 86,
"start_time": 2091.937,
"text": " I'm going to talk more about that in a moment. But I guess my point here is that I think this is the most interesting question to answer. And there are good reasons to believe that gravity could act different to the other forces. And that is because gravity is the only one that has an equivalence principle. So there is not an equivalence principle for the others. And also the equivalence principle"
},
{
"end_time": 2144.838,
"index": 87,
"start_time": 2121.578,
"text": " If you're in a lift and you don't have any way to look at what's happening, so in a box outside, you could not distinguish when you feel an acceleration if that is because you're in the presence of a gravitational field or just because the box is being accelerated. And that is something that is specific from gravity and that could distinguish gravity from the other forces."
},
{
"end_time": 2171.271,
"index": 88,
"start_time": 2145.094,
"text": " So that is something also that Roger argues that might hint at gravity being fundamentally different. Okay, so I mean obviously the question is very important per se, but also as I said it underpins other very interesting fundamental questions in physics. I found this picture, the one with the"
},
{
"end_time": 2201.988,
"index": 89,
"start_time": 2172.244,
"text": " With the stars and so on, uh, on online is a very famous one. I actually, you know, one of the things I lost, I guess I lost my talk just a few moments ago where all the credits to the images. So I'm sorry. I had done that detail and so on. But well, when I saw this picture, I liked it very much and it made me think about how was it when we were trying to make sense of, let's say if you want cosmology of where are we, what's this?"
},
{
"end_time": 2226.954,
"index": 90,
"start_time": 2202.483,
"text": " Let's say world that we're seeing what are those points in the sky that appear at night in the way what's the universe and so on without instruments no so i can imagine i like to have a romantic image of that of you know people sitting around the fireplace and looking at the sky and trying to make sense of where are we."
},
{
"end_time": 2252.654,
"index": 91,
"start_time": 2228.08,
"text": " Without the telescope you can imagine how hard that would be and what sort of theories humanity came up with when the only possibility was to use our own instrument that are our eyes and look at the sky. Then Galileo invented the telescope. It's very interesting that as well that when Galileo invented the telescope many people didn't want to look through it."
},
{
"end_time": 2277.892,
"index": 92,
"start_time": 2253.08,
"text": " That also makes me think about a lot of the stuff happening in science where people sort of refuse to look at certain theories. That reminds me, I also heard you talk about that and you were talking about, well, if you're working in string theory or in quantum gravity, don't you have sort of the moral responsibility of looking at what other options are there?"
},
{
"end_time": 2306.561,
"index": 93,
"start_time": 2277.892,
"text": " Yes right and that i think it's like refusing to pay attention to competitive theories or other ideas i think it's a little bit equivalent like refusing to look through the telescope interesting. Somebody comes with a new invention says look look at what's happening you say no i don't want to even look but that happened. No since since then telescopes have developed incredibly."
},
{
"end_time": 2334.104,
"index": 94,
"start_time": 2307.039,
"text": " We have amazing like the latest pictures that you you see are just like amazing what what they can do but well now with very good instruments we could look at the sky we can look really into the past of our universe and then see that oh wow it looks like the universe is an expansion and so on and we can come up with more meaningful theories with better theories thanks to those observations."
},
{
"end_time": 2363.268,
"index": 95,
"start_time": 2334.906,
"text": " Same if you think about the microscopic world. So the Greek came with the idea of the atoms. But again, it's not until you build a microscope and you can look into the microscopic world that you can do better atomic physics. So I'm trying to make the point here about how important have instruments been in us making better theories and understanding things better, right?"
},
{
"end_time": 2392.193,
"index": 96,
"start_time": 2363.763,
"text": " So when it comes to these scales where quantum mechanics and general relativity interplay, we're blind. We don't even have our instrument. We don't even have our eyes. We don't have anything. So how do you go about right when you do that? So I think I understand string theory and loop quantum gravity and many of these very mathematical approaches."
},
{
"end_time": 2420.742,
"index": 97,
"start_time": 2393.063,
"text": " In that sense is that you do what you can when you what you have at hand and what we're able to do is super powerful studies with mathematics because our mathematics is very developed and you were also talking about that how actually string theory has allowed mathematics to develop so much and so much we've learned about mathematics"
},
{
"end_time": 2437.244,
"index": 98,
"start_time": 2420.981,
"text": " Thanks to those theories but when you when you come up with theories and mathematics well there's many possibilities you can make many theories almost as many as you can think about but which one is the right one."
},
{
"end_time": 2460.503,
"index": 99,
"start_time": 2438.097,
"text": " you know i can make a theory but then i need to see if actually nature behaves like my theory predicts right and i can have a competing theory a different one and which one is the right maybe even contradicting it's the two theories in principle in their predictions how do you know which one is the right one you need to go to the experiment you need to go to those instruments and we"
},
{
"end_time": 2488.302,
"index": 100,
"start_time": 2460.708,
"text": " Will we i'm going to argue that we sort of have them already and we need to start looking for resolving these questions of unification alright what i think we want to do is to get into this cycle in which let's say you come up with an idea so this would be philosophy and creativity so going back to the example of the atoms."
},
{
"end_time": 2511.101,
"index": 101,
"start_time": 2488.66,
"text": " Right so the greek came up with the using philosophy and creativity and so on with the idea that there must be something in matter that you cannot keep dividing so there must be this unit and the idea of it cannot be divided anymore so the idea of an atom then well if you want to."
},
{
"end_time": 2526.22,
"index": 102,
"start_time": 2511.647,
"text": " Observe an atom well that's like a really long way around right but you have to do some theory about what is an atom so well a very very long time after."
},
{
"end_time": 2555.708,
"index": 103,
"start_time": 2526.766,
"text": " People started to develop better theories of the atom or, for example, I don't know, the pancake theory where you had some, you know, electrons like raisins in a pancake or even better bores model, or you have like the nuclear and the electrons going around like if they were like planets around the sun, right? So you need to create some some theory so that you can build an apparatus and then observe"
},
{
"end_time": 2582.961,
"index": 104,
"start_time": 2556.459,
"text": " This idea that you had that there's atoms because you cannot build a machine or propose an experiment or develop a new sensor without some sort of theory. Your theory might be wrong, but at least it gives you a starting point to say, okay, now I'm going to build this machine. At Capella University, learning online doesn't mean learning alone."
},
{
"end_time": 2612.875,
"index": 105,
"start_time": 2583.626,
"text": " You'll get support from people who care about your success, like your enrollment specialist who gets to know you and the goals you'd like to achieve. You'll also get a designated academic coach who's with you throughout your entire program. Plus, career coaches are available to help you navigate your professional goals. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu. Then you built, let's say, the microscope."
},
{
"end_time": 2641.493,
"index": 106,
"start_time": 2613.473,
"text": " And you look through it and then you get some sort of signals and at some point like a detector's click or something like that and you say, oh, there's my aptum. Right. So and then you might then find out that your theory was actually not very good, but then you can improve it and modify your apparatus. And then you get into this really good cycle."
},
{
"end_time": 2650.009,
"index": 107,
"start_time": 2641.937,
"text": " Where you can start making better theories all the time and verify them into the experiment. So this is what happened with quantum optics."
},
{
"end_time": 2678.609,
"index": 108,
"start_time": 2650.196,
"text": " It seems like this is what happens with the general theory. So if I'm understanding you correctly, it sounds like what you're saying is you're initially on your couch or in your shower, an idea comes to you, it's an intuition, you then formulate it with words, natural language, you then have to formulate it into mathematical language. And then you have to check that against quote unquote reality with an experiment. Yes. So you propose an experiment and the experimental proposal, that's what I work a lot on an experimental proposals is also mathematical."
},
{
"end_time": 2703.507,
"index": 109,
"start_time": 2678.609,
"text": " Right i have to write down my theoretical proposal this is what you. This is your hamiltonian and these are your measurements and this is the position and i claim that you should be able to build this device and i'm going to show you like one of my works in that talk about of course of my proposals to do that and then you need to build it and then check."
},
{
"end_time": 2725.776,
"index": 110,
"start_time": 2704.241,
"text": " Okay and you were giving a specific example in quantum optics please continue with quantum optics is very healthy cycle and i think that's why there's been so much progress in quantum technologies is because this happens all the time people come up with an idea for a sensor and they write papers about it they make a proposal then experimental group."
},
{
"end_time": 2755.811,
"index": 111,
"start_time": 2726.237,
"text": " gets a hold of it, they work together and boom, they showed that and there comes again the cycle and it's a wonderful field. And I think I was used to that. So when I started to work on Alice falls into a black hole and entanglement in black holes, I was like, Oh, gosh, I can't check if what I propose is correct. Because there's no way to make a measurement in a black hole. And that's how I started to say no, no, I want to do theory that it can actually, you know,"
},
{
"end_time": 2770.845,
"index": 112,
"start_time": 2756.254,
"text": " Still work at the interplay of quantum mechanics in general activity but that i can test in the in the lab. So that's like my my group and most of the last i don't know maybe fifteen years that's what i've been."
},
{
"end_time": 2788.217,
"index": 113,
"start_time": 2771.288,
"text": " What is FP?"
},
{
"end_time": 2813.643,
"index": 114,
"start_time": 2788.797,
"text": " Gr quantum theory i forgot what did i put here for the most like quantum theory for sure gr and fundamental physics is fundamental physics yeah maybe that's a funny figure. Okay so when when i was at university and i learned about quantum mechanics and general relativity back in the day."
},
{
"end_time": 2829.121,
"index": 115,
"start_time": 2813.933,
"text": " Will you know for example louise la penya would say quantum mechanics only applies to a few particles and very smart very small scale so where electrons and atoms live."
},
{
"end_time": 2854.872,
"index": 116,
"start_time": 2830.043,
"text": " And general relativity applies to the large scales. No, starting with actually with from GPS, we need to get the positions we have, we need to make corrections due to general relativity. So the proper time in Earth on Earth is different from the proper time in a satellite. And you need to make corrections to have the positions that we have in in in GPS. So it would start like say from those kind of scales,"
},
{
"end_time": 2884.77,
"index": 117,
"start_time": 2854.872,
"text": " Onwards i mean we know that general relativity doesn't really apply to all the scales because you know the rotating curves of galaxies the observations there contradict the predictions of general relativity and from there like the whole of the idea of dark matter comes about no so it doesn't really apply but let's say generally your students and you're told quantum physics applies to the very small and general relativity to the very big."
},
{
"end_time": 2906.271,
"index": 118,
"start_time": 2885.52,
"text": " Now because of this circle that I was telling you about, now the experiments in quantum technologies developed amazingly and now completely challenge this picture and I want to tell you a lot about that. So I'm going to talk about three things. One is long range"
},
{
"end_time": 2930.879,
"index": 119,
"start_time": 2906.561,
"text": " quantum entanglement so what are the longest distances at which we can prepare superposition states or entangled states and so on and what how can we study such situations and what can we learn about the interplay of quantum mechanics and general relativity through long-range quantum experiments then high sensitivity"
},
{
"end_time": 2955.026,
"index": 120,
"start_time": 2931.323,
"text": " Actually when I started to work on using quantum theory, I wanted to, you know, measure some relativistic effects. Some of my colleagues in general relativity were laughing at me because they were saying, well, you know, at a small scales, forget it. Space time is a bit flat. It's a completely flat. Sorry. You won't see anything. I'll show you that that's not true."
},
{
"end_time": 2982.449,
"index": 121,
"start_time": 2955.657,
"text": " And these are already like experiments that have reached relativistic effects. We're just not looking through the telescope right yet because, well, I'll tell you more when I get there. The one that hasn't gotten to scales where gravity kicks in in an important manner is large mass quantum experiments. So I also want to tell you about the progress in that"
},
{
"end_time": 3012.688,
"index": 122,
"start_time": 2982.756,
"text": " I have a quick question if you don't mind. Yes, sure."
},
{
"end_time": 3039.684,
"index": 123,
"start_time": 3012.688,
"text": " i'm going to actually go into the details of the question that you just asked me i have a slide on that so it sounds like a really wonderful question right right to the point but the short answer now is that people brush the the questions in a way out the you know they they they find solutions which i uh don't think are solutions that they're like let's say well maybe"
},
{
"end_time": 3067.841,
"index": 124,
"start_time": 3040.282,
"text": " Approximately work but actually are not the right thing to do if you want to be let's say rigorous with what you're doing and actually that it gives you the opportunity to answer these questions so i i'll go i have a slide on on that exactly the question that you're asking me great we think alike yes i noticed that before you from the podcasts in many ways actually cool"
},
{
"end_time": 3097.961,
"index": 125,
"start_time": 3069.548,
"text": " Okay, so let's talk about the long range experiments. When I was a student, you know, when Pablo came, my colleague into the cafeteria and told me they demonstrated quantum teleportation in the lab that was in Vienna, that was Anton Salinger, it was in a tabletop experiment. So you have like a table that could fit in this room, let's say, with mirrors and lasers and so on. And that's how experiments look"
},
{
"end_time": 3122.278,
"index": 126,
"start_time": 3098.2,
"text": " like in those times. Then Anton and some years later wanted to see how big can the distances can the experiment grow such that you still have entanglement. So this is entanglement between photons. Okay. And he was able to demonstrate entanglement across two different buildings in Vienna."
},
{
"end_time": 3152.21,
"index": 127,
"start_time": 3123.302,
"text": " So well, that was very promising. So he said, well, let's let's keep going. And then in 2011, he was already doing the experiment across 144 kilometers and in the Canary Islands. Oh, so they're not physically connected tubes that connected the two buildings nor in this 1000 kilometer case. Well, there are many experiments that are connected that are connected by a waveguide."
},
{
"end_time": 3179.292,
"index": 128,
"start_time": 3152.637,
"text": " People do experiments like that, but no, these are like free space experiments. Interesting. Yeah, they're beautiful. They're very, very interesting. So Anton had a student from China who then moved back to China and then, you know, he's made a lot of progress there and together they launched a satellite, which is called Mikus, which is completely purposed."
},
{
"end_time": 3206.954,
"index": 129,
"start_time": 3179.65,
"text": " To study quantum entanglement and teleportation and cryptography and so on. So this was they launched it in 2016. And and then they've demonstrated entanglement across thousands of kilometers. Right. So that's very interesting now, because this whole notion of quantum mechanics applies to very small scales. Now we see that that's not the case. Well, of course, photons are"
},
{
"end_time": 3236.613,
"index": 130,
"start_time": 3207.551,
"text": " You know they're not massive systems or anything like that but already I think this starts showing that this division of what are the skills where quantum applies and where it's a different maybe in some senses as we first thought it would be. But well I mean what's very interesting is like as I mentioned before at the skills where satellites operate relativity kicks in again the proper time"
},
{
"end_time": 3263.831,
"index": 131,
"start_time": 3237.056,
"text": " of clocks measured on earth is different to the clocks that you said that are in a satellite so you have to take into account at least a gravitational redshift so this is like a special relativistic effect but more than that so that is something that I've been very interested in I have a whole series of papers that"
},
{
"end_time": 3285.998,
"index": 132,
"start_time": 3264.258,
"text": " Use quantum field theory in curved space time to describe the space time of the earth using, for example, the structural metric, which is can be applied to this case. And then you describe the photons and the quantum states that travel from earth to a satellite or between links in between different satellites."
},
{
"end_time": 3308.507,
"index": 133,
"start_time": 3286.391,
"text": " As using quantum field theory in space time you can solve the equations and then construct wave packets and study how the. Let's say if you send a wave pack from earth to a satellite how would this be modified due to the curvature of the space time."
},
{
"end_time": 3332.398,
"index": 134,
"start_time": 3309.07,
"text": " Under light so this is no longer just special relativity using gravitational redshift that was what people were using we show that if you use quantum field theory incur space time. You could actually go beyond that and really see how the curvature of space time affects the for example we wrote some of these papers and we said this is."
},
{
"end_time": 3348.899,
"index": 135,
"start_time": 3332.551,
"text": " What the curvature how would it affect for example quantum teleportation or quantum cryptography and then you could turn things around and use the fact that these states are modified to actually estimate the."
},
{
"end_time": 3366.63,
"index": 136,
"start_time": 3349.224,
"text": " The space time parameters of the earth using quantum metrology that's an area of interest and i've written a series of papers in that direction more or less trying to answer this sort of questions but you see this is these are experiments that already."
},
{
"end_time": 3388.114,
"index": 137,
"start_time": 3367.227,
"text": " Are taking place and actually there was a group working in Germany that once the whole group came to visit mine because they had some results they were not understanding and they using just the gravitational redshift and they wanted to see if there was more to be understood from from our work."
},
{
"end_time": 3411.135,
"index": 138,
"start_time": 3388.814,
"text": " So this is an instance where you do see that some interplay between quantum states and the space time of the earth, the experiments reach those scales, but there is very little apart from our work. I don't see that there's many more things or"
},
{
"end_time": 3437.637,
"index": 139,
"start_time": 3411.51,
"text": " Or the experiments actually, they take into account the gravitational redshift, but they still have to test this sort of things. Now, quantum field theory in curved space time has not been demonstrated in the experiment. Quantum field theory, yes, I mean, so many times that's what CERN and Fermilab and all of these experiments are about. But when you have gravity included,"
},
{
"end_time": 3456.271,
"index": 140,
"start_time": 3438.183,
"text": " It still needs to be demonstrated so some of these predictions that we make could start giving you some hints that quantum field theory in cursed place and let's say it's a it's a good theory for the scales it would be very nice to check that."
},
{
"end_time": 3480.23,
"index": 141,
"start_time": 3457.056,
"text": " So for the audience member who's thinking, how does this work logistically? Do you have to petition for time from this satellite or do you have to ask the people who are in charge of the satellite to perform an experiment? How does it work? Well, I actually belong to a group that was sort of a consortium in which"
},
{
"end_time": 3504.514,
"index": 142,
"start_time": 3480.776,
"text": " They work together with the theoreticians, with the experimentalists, and the group sort of discussed about which would be things that would be interesting to study. So the theoreticians would say, well, we would like to test this theory. Let's say I had a colleague, Tim Ralph, who came up with a new theory that"
},
{
"end_time": 3531.374,
"index": 143,
"start_time": 3504.514,
"text": " We sort of work use quantum field theory in space time but when beyond that and take into account close time like curves and then he proposed an experiment and then the group found this. Interesting from a theoretical point of view but the important thing there was that the experimental list found it feasible to do the experiment and the experiment was done."
},
{
"end_time": 3557.244,
"index": 144,
"start_time": 3532.295,
"text": " And the experiment didn't find evidence of this sort of new theory. But you see, that is the sort of thing that is great. That's the sort of thing you want to be doing that people are creative, come up with new ideas. Again, the circle cast it in language first, then in, you know, the language of theoretical physics, which is mathematics, make predictions, experimental is go test and they say, well,"
},
{
"end_time": 3580.162,
"index": 145,
"start_time": 3557.773,
"text": " Yes or no and then you go on. So I think that there are groups like that and usually also what we do is that we get together theoreticians with experimentalists and make a proposal that might or not get funded. Of course with space-based experiments is more complicated."
},
{
"end_time": 3609.804,
"index": 146,
"start_time": 3580.811,
"text": " I have actually been approached by NASA a few times and they asked me, do you have an experiment that you think we could do? But the things I've been working on lately are more things that you could also test on earth. And then you need to justify the expense. But well, these, I mean, I did point out to these papers and I said, well, I think it would be great if you could test some of these. But I haven't heard like, oh, yes, we're doing it or anything like that yet."
},
{
"end_time": 3639.241,
"index": 147,
"start_time": 3610.213,
"text": " Okay so now we go to the clocks question that you were asking me and the very small scales. So yes like you were saying quantum clocks are the most precise clocks that we have and actually that is what we use to you know distribute clocks in the planet and you need to synchronize very well computers and you know airplanes and all sort of things that we need a very you know"
},
{
"end_time": 3669.309,
"index": 148,
"start_time": 3639.991,
"text": " very precise ways of measuring time. And these are done by atomic clock. So, you know, very roughly, how would atomic clock work is that you have many atoms here, for example, strontium trapped in an electromagnetic potential. So the sample could be like atoms that are cold. So that means they move very little and they're within some sort of volume. So typically it's like a millimeter."
},
{
"end_time": 3695.503,
"index": 149,
"start_time": 3669.701,
"text": " And so on. So the energy levels, the internal energy levels of atoms are very sharp. So let's say between the ground state and the excited state, the energy is very precise. So you can use this as a frequency standard that gives you like the ticks of the clock very precisely. So you shine a laser and you excite the atoms and so on. And well, that's more or less what you what you use."
},
{
"end_time": 3724.07,
"index": 150,
"start_time": 3695.879,
"text": " So there was this beautiful experiment done many years ago by Dave Wineland who got the Nobel Prize for trapping irons in an iron trap. He did this experiment after in which he would take an atomic clock and then sort of put another one or just move his clock upwards. I'm not sure actually what he did."
},
{
"end_time": 3732.978,
"index": 151,
"start_time": 3724.428,
"text": " But he could he demonstrated time dilation at thirty three centimeters so before we know we can see time dilation."
},
{
"end_time": 3756.92,
"index": 152,
"start_time": 3733.234,
"text": " If we're in the earth and then in a satellite, we know that. But now he said, look at these scales of 33 centimeters, you can see time dilation already. And that time dilation is just due to the gravitational potential difference? Yes, due to the earth, just from the gravitational field of the of the earth. So basically, you're demonstrating that the space time is curved. Yes. No."
},
{
"end_time": 3775.077,
"index": 153,
"start_time": 3757.466,
"text": " That's really amazing. These clocks are super precise. They have a systematic uncertainty. They can reach 10 to the minus 18. That means that the error is one part in 10 to the 18. That would be more or less"
},
{
"end_time": 3794.172,
"index": 154,
"start_time": 3775.077,
"text": " Like in years i used to have it here cuz i forget but the clock would lose precision one and once it would lose one second and some something like thirty billion years i have the number here exactly but i now lost it but more or less know that precise."
},
{
"end_time": 3822.039,
"index": 155,
"start_time": 3794.787,
"text": " They are and that's what i was telling my my colleagues in general activity that found it funny that i wanted to measure this curvature things i said no look i mean these things are so precise you know that that is not unthinkable that we can actually measure general relativistic effects. Add very small scales so i was talking to patrick gill so he's a colleague of mine who works at the national physics laboratory."
},
{
"end_time": 3850.913,
"index": 156,
"start_time": 3822.466,
"text": " So that is like the institution in the UK where they do all these with the metrology institute where they do all these standards of frequency and the different units and so on. So he's working with quantum clocks with Helen Margolis and so on. And I was telling them, you know what, soon you're going to have a problem because you're going to get the proper time at the bottom of your sample"
},
{
"end_time": 3864.462,
"index": 157,
"start_time": 3851.442,
"text": " with the proper time at the top is going to be different and he was saying like yeah but we're not too worried about this now and so in six months later exactly that happened two papers came out."
},
{
"end_time": 3893.831,
"index": 158,
"start_time": 3864.804,
"text": " Showing that you know, they could see time dilation. Well first there was like this one centimeter and then even in one millimeter Wow So now if you think about the quantum clocks the clock in the atoms in the bottom see a proper time different from the atoms Super interesting, but okay still, you know People working clocks might not be that worried. When did this result come out? That must have been a couple of years ago"
},
{
"end_time": 3923.353,
"index": 159,
"start_time": 3893.831,
"text": " Okay, so fairly recently 2020s. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Wow. Maybe this is actually look, this is from 20 that this paper I put here is one of the papers and it says published in 2022. I think it might have been submitted in 2020 or 2021, but it was published very recently. Sure. It's still cutting edge. I see. So, okay, so it's not a problem as long as the atoms are independent."
},
{
"end_time": 3951.493,
"index": 160,
"start_time": 3923.968,
"text": " Because then what you can do which is what we do with time dilation with GPS is like we know how that changes so we can theoretically correct for it and then you just that take that into account and you don't have a problem okay but now people want to make these clocks more precise and beat this one ten to the minus eighteen uncertainty by entangling the atoms."
},
{
"end_time": 3976.698,
"index": 161,
"start_time": 3952.329,
"text": " Because we've showed in quantum metrology that if you have entangled atoms you get you know a precision instead of going like one over square root of and it's one over and it's called the heisenberg limit and this makes things much more precise. Okay so if you do that then you have a problem you then you you you you you you bang your head with quantum mechanics and general relativity being incompatible."
},
{
"end_time": 4006.357,
"index": 162,
"start_time": 3977.244,
"text": " Why because what time are you going to use the proper time is going to be different in different heights and the shredding your equation on you know on the left hand side is like dndt an absolute time. So here you have a relative time different at each height so which time you wanna use okay so again the experimentalist they all were not worried about it at all events because we just use the time at the center of the trap."
},
{
"end_time": 4022.363,
"index": 163,
"start_time": 4006.817,
"text": " That doesn't work that well and it's like a it's a patch but forget about it let's say maybe for what they want to do. It's good enough i don't know but from a theoretical point of view this is not the right thing to do."
},
{
"end_time": 4041.988,
"index": 164,
"start_time": 4022.91,
"text": " But you're actually losing on the possibility of learning what we should be doing because this is really a very good example where you are at these stages where quantum mechanics and general relativity interplay but we don't have a theory to describe that experiment."
},
{
"end_time": 4067.398,
"index": 165,
"start_time": 4042.568,
"text": " So what I was telling, I recently went and visited the group at NPL, at the National Physics Laboratory, and I was having a little discussion about this. And I was telling them that we don't have experiments to address these questions. I know you're having an experiment that actually is getting there. So let's use this experiment."
},
{
"end_time": 4090.179,
"index": 166,
"start_time": 4067.398,
"text": " Who to try so you have a theory that's good the theory is that you're using is that you say well i can more or less do with taking the proper time at the center of my. You know of my sample. What if you if you want to be rigorous really what you have is that you lost your notion of."
},
{
"end_time": 4111.8,
"index": 167,
"start_time": 4090.486,
"text": " Time of clock time and you need to come up with a new thing but that is what opens the the opportunity of you know you you came up with a theory which is not very good i think which is measuring at the center well you mentioned theoretical problems but it sounds like what you're describing is more akin to missed opportunities for probing"
},
{
"end_time": 4127.705,
"index": 168,
"start_time": 4112.159,
"text": " the interaction of general relativity with quantum theory."
},
{
"end_time": 4154.241,
"index": 169,
"start_time": 4128.217,
"text": " What is wrong is the theory that we're using to describe your experiment, but you need to start somewhere again, the little circle that we talked about. So I start with a theory that's not very good. Then you do the experiment. We looked at the experimental results and then I come up with a way of modifying my theory. Yeah. So right now I have a PhD student working on this project on this problem that I like very much."
},
{
"end_time": 4182.688,
"index": 170,
"start_time": 4154.821,
"text": " And we've made some progress before, not with atoms but with light. I want to show you more or less what we did before. So Einstein came up with this idea of the Einstein light clock. Extra value meals are back. That means 10 tender juicy McNuggets and medium fries and a drink are just $8 only at McDonald's. For limited time only. Prices and participation may vary. Prices may be higher in Hawaii, Alaska and California and for delivery."
},
{
"end_time": 4203.319,
"index": 171,
"start_time": 4183.063,
"text": " So he basically he used this clock this idea of a clock to argue things for relativity and so on so he considered two mirrors and then a photon bouncing back and forth and that gave you like the ticking of the clock and then he talked about what happens if you move this clock and so on."
},
{
"end_time": 4225.452,
"index": 172,
"start_time": 4203.695,
"text": " But now we can use quantum field theory and quantum optics to quantize the idea of Einstein's clock. So I've done that. I wrote another series of papers in that direction is to say, okay, now I have two mirrors, but I have a quantum electromagnetic field inside."
},
{
"end_time": 4254.019,
"index": 173,
"start_time": 4225.981,
"text": " So I get like, when you do that, you get sort of the field that you can write down as an infinite sum of different modes. So those are like states that are sharp in frequency, but the photons are completely delocalized in your box. But you can use quantum field theory to describe that. So that was also like a long journey because when I started to work with that, you could only do this in flat space."
},
{
"end_time": 4272.5,
"index": 174,
"start_time": 4254.531,
"text": " And the only motion that people could describe was a sinusoidal motion of the walls and this was like the dynamical casimir effect but i wanted to do more than that i wanted to consider her space from the earth to a planet and send the little box up to study how."
},
{
"end_time": 4293.285,
"index": 175,
"start_time": 4273.046,
"text": " The curvature the underlying curvature of the earth would affect the quantum clock or how would like an interplay of quantum states with time dilation would look like and all that sort of thing and gosh that was really really hard because i'm solving those equations was very complicated."
},
{
"end_time": 4312.807,
"index": 176,
"start_time": 4293.285,
"text": " What allowed me to make progress was working with a colleague in nottingham where i used to work who is an expert in quantum field theory and curved space time and then we managed to come up with a new methodology where we could now start solving those sort of problems."
},
{
"end_time": 4339.855,
"index": 177,
"start_time": 4313.166,
"text": " In a more general way and then i had a student and a postdoc and that helped me generalize this to curve space and so on and then so we've been now we have a clock model which is basically einstein's light like clock but with a quantum field we fix a frequency and the oscillations of the quantum states of this frequency mode give you like the ticking of the clock"
},
{
"end_time": 4366.186,
"index": 178,
"start_time": 4340.35,
"text": " But now we can move that into space and ask questions about the interplay of time dilation with quantum things. And we found some interesting things like when you move the clock due to things like called the dynamical Casimir effect, you create particles like photons inside the clock and these affect time dilation. Interesting. So it's kind of fun doing that."
},
{
"end_time": 4389.514,
"index": 179,
"start_time": 4366.63,
"text": " I don't think you go to the very fundamental questions by doing it, but you start learning certain things. One of the things I was interested in is that if you use these clocks to measure space and time or time dilation and so on, because the state of the field is a quantum field,"
},
{
"end_time": 4410.299,
"index": 180,
"start_time": 4389.889,
"text": " Then you start getting into these uncertainty principles of things that you can actually not measure space and time with infinite precision like if you measure. Time very precisely then space is not and this sort of thing so i wanted to explore more the let's say."
},
{
"end_time": 4436.596,
"index": 181,
"start_time": 4410.896,
"text": " The constraints that you get by in measuring space time by using a quantum system. Usually when people speak about Heisenberg's uncertainty, they're talking about position and momentum and you're talking about space and time. Well, I mean, you could well, yeah, no, they don't go together. No. So you have energy and time and then momentum and position. Yes."
},
{
"end_time": 4463.541,
"index": 182,
"start_time": 4437.278,
"text": " But in these clocks you have an interplay of things. You have states that obey minimum uncertainty in space and momentum, so they're called Gaussian states, coherent states, and then we move these in space and then you have constraints that come also from the energy and the time."
},
{
"end_time": 4487.073,
"index": 183,
"start_time": 4464.718,
"text": " so i didn't kind of go into much detail i wasn't very precise when i when i said that but you started getting the role of the different uncertainty principles that you get from quantum theory you know playing a role in how well your clock works and things like that which is very interesting cool this work goes back to 2014 yeah so"
},
{
"end_time": 4512.415,
"index": 184,
"start_time": 4487.329,
"text": " I'll leave a link to all the articles that have been mentioned in this talk, either visually or just audibly in the description. So people, if you're interested, you can read more. Yes, this is how we got started. So this first paper was in flat space. But now, like, I think I think have this is the latest paper that was published about clocks that was published in in 2023. There we can now since we managed to"
},
{
"end_time": 4530.06,
"index": 185,
"start_time": 4512.892,
"text": " Let's say generalize our techniques to include curved space time. I mean, it sounds simple, but literally it took us more than 15 years to be able to do that. And yeah, we're using quantum field theory in curved space time."
},
{
"end_time": 4554.565,
"index": 186,
"start_time": 4530.333,
"text": " So then we finally had some theoretical methodologies that allow us to address that question and what we did is like we looked at a clock, a light clock, but we now were able to describe the clock in the space time of the earth, treating the space time of the earth like with a structural metric, and come up with a model of a clock and discuss how the clock ticks."
},
{
"end_time": 4574.65,
"index": 187,
"start_time": 4554.94,
"text": " And you know talk about the radius of the earth and how does this show up in the face of the clock and so on so that was like an interesting we then came up with a notion of clock time already in this clock at each slice within the clock the proper time is different."
},
{
"end_time": 4597.466,
"index": 188,
"start_time": 4575.572,
"text": " And we said okay but you could still build a clock by looking at the collective oscillations and that gave me an idea that okay now maybe we can go back to the atoms and redefine the notion of the clock time using the collective oscillations and so on but this is a student of mine is working on that and"
},
{
"end_time": 4615.009,
"index": 189,
"start_time": 4597.91,
"text": " We don't, you know, we're just starting like we don't really have much to say about the atomic case yet. Alright. Okay. So now the last thing I want to talk about with respect to these experiments is mass."
},
{
"end_time": 4635.674,
"index": 190,
"start_time": 4615.794,
"text": " So yeah, I was telling you how Roger proposed many years ago that if you have a massive superposition, this is unstable. And he argued that by showing that there was a conflict between the superposition principle and the equivalence principle."
},
{
"end_time": 4664.275,
"index": 191,
"start_time": 4635.674,
"text": " So he said yes you could have a superposition of a massive system that for him this would already be quantum gravity because you have a gravitational field in a superposition of two different configurations but these are unstable and they decay very quickly and that is why we don't see superposition in the classical world. So what kind of masses would you need to you know,"
},
{
"end_time": 4688.353,
"index": 192,
"start_time": 4664.565,
"text": " In order to see if the predictions of Roger are correct or not. Do you mind briefly outlining why is it that the superposition contradicts the equivalence principle or the strong equivalence principle? Yes, so he starts by describing a mass that is in a superposition that is falling."
},
{
"end_time": 4710.111,
"index": 193,
"start_time": 4689.445,
"text": " And then he says, okay, if you describe this situation from a Newtonian point of view, and he writes like the wave function and now from an Einsteinian point of view, and he writes like a different equation. So he says this way functions have to be the same up to a face."
},
{
"end_time": 4735.555,
"index": 194,
"start_time": 4710.657,
"text": " No, because in quantum theory states wave functions are equivalent up to a phase. So, but you see his whole argument, I actually I'm going to show you a paper that I wrote with Roger in the next slide. And in that paper, we write an introduction where we go through Roger's arguments, but they're not necessarily simple."
},
{
"end_time": 4764.633,
"index": 195,
"start_time": 4736.254,
"text": " And one of the reasons why is because we don't have a theory for that. So Roger makes arguments that are like good arguments, well informed, but without actually having a theory. So sometimes the arguments are talking about quantum field theory in curved space time. And then he might make a Newtonian approximation and so on. But then he shows that the Einsteinian point of view is different from the Newtonian point of view."
},
{
"end_time": 4783.831,
"index": 196,
"start_time": 4765.333,
"text": " And that there is a contradiction there and that then because of that he argues that these super positions should be short lived and he goes beyond that because he gives you a formula that measures sort of the error."
},
{
"end_time": 4812.705,
"index": 197,
"start_time": 4784.411,
"text": " And this gives you an energy uncertainty, and it's related to the gravitational self energy of the difference in the superposition. So you take some maybe that is maybe going more technical, but we can if you if you if you want to, because I know that your followers are quite well educated in physics. So let me jump and then I come back."
},
{
"end_time": 4842.142,
"index": 198,
"start_time": 4813.507,
"text": " a little bit here. This is the paper that I mentioned that, that I wrote with Roger. And what we did in this paper is that we calculated, you know, how massive with these super positions had to be if we use the Bose-Seinstein condensate, I'm going to come back to that. But we found that you need at least something like 10 to the nine atoms."
},
{
"end_time": 4872.961,
"index": 199,
"start_time": 4843.148,
"text": " In a superposition and let me tell you where the field is now. So well, people started to put electrons in a superposition of two different locations using like a double slit experiment. I don't know already. I don't know. Maybe 90 years ago, I don't remember when was the first experiment with electrons. And from there they said, okay, it works for electrons. Amazing. Let's do it now with the atoms. And you know, then it's like how bigger can the states"
},
{
"end_time": 4900.555,
"index": 200,
"start_time": 4873.251,
"text": " The system gets and the record is on hold by marcus arms group in the university of vienna as well and where he has been able to put a big molecules in a superposition and by big i mean the molecules have around two thousand atoms. Wow but you know for gravity to act you need at least ten to the nine actually for molecules you need even more."
},
{
"end_time": 4928.968,
"index": 201,
"start_time": 4902.039,
"text": " So you can see we're very far from that. What do you mean for gravity to act? I thought the assumption is that gravity acts as long as you have mass. Don't these have masses? Yes, but these are stable superpositions. Oh, according to the calculation from Penrose? Yes. Well, Marcus showed that you can have these superpositions and I think they lasted milliseconds. I don't exactly remember how long he had them for."
},
{
"end_time": 4950.93,
"index": 202,
"start_time": 4929.599,
"text": " So they are stable for that long in the lab. So gravity is not causing the collapse of superpositions at those scales. I see, I see. But now the question is, is Roger right? Because if Roger is right, then that explains why we don't see superpositions in the macroscopic world."
},
{
"end_time": 4981.015,
"index": 203,
"start_time": 4952.056,
"text": " And what would be super interesting is to see that no, that is a big open question in fundamental quantum mechanics is to understand what takes you from quantum states being in super positions to the classical world where we don't see quantum super positions. It's a very interesting question. Marcus and many other people are trying to address this question in an experimental point of view from the experiment by building like trying to put more mass into the super positions."
},
{
"end_time": 5007.892,
"index": 204,
"start_time": 4981.749,
"text": " There are many different experiments going on at the moment and they use, for example, nano particles, nano beads made of silicon or silica, diamonds, little mirrors, roads, even membranes. There's many, many experiments going on. And also a record has been held by Marcus Aspenmeyer also in Vienna. So I spent three years in Vienna because of these amazing"
},
{
"end_time": 5034.138,
"index": 205,
"start_time": 5008.353,
"text": " People and experiments there so i was very lucky to get a visiting professorship for that long and and you know be in the same environment where where these amazing scientists are and so marcus was able to bring one of these nanobits to the quantum regime by cooling it down to lower vibrational"
},
{
"end_time": 5049.991,
"index": 206,
"start_time": 5034.633,
"text": " states so they're already in the quantum let's say scales but with 10 to the 8 atomic masses so quite a big beat but he cannot put them yet into a superposition of two different locations."
},
{
"end_time": 5070.708,
"index": 207,
"start_time": 5050.657,
"text": " That has not been possible also one of my colleagues and i'm in southampton so one of my colleagues there and hendrick old bridge also has a very recent amazing paper where he takes these little beads and he manages to measure gravity. This is all classical."
},
{
"end_time": 5092.824,
"index": 208,
"start_time": 5070.998,
"text": " But anyway, I mean at those scales where where quantum starts to kick in. Well, what he wants to do is push these experiments so that maybe he sees some quantum gravity and still far from that. But right, let's say approaching. But this is where things are at with respect to the experiments with big mass."
},
{
"end_time": 5119.377,
"index": 209,
"start_time": 5094.292,
"text": " What I did with Roger is that when he started to tell me about his proposal and the experiments that people were doing, I noticed that all of these experiments were using solids, mirrors, beads and so on, and it's very difficult to cool a solid to the"
},
{
"end_time": 5135.606,
"index": 210,
"start_time": 5120.555,
"text": " To very cold temperatures where you have little noise so they haven't been able to to to make more progress noise because you can't cool them enough."
},
{
"end_time": 5160.64,
"index": 211,
"start_time": 5138.746,
"text": " Like the coldest things that we can do and you can get up to ten to the atoms i mean that's not very common but there's been an experiment using hydrogen in which they could tend to the ten atoms into a condensate so let me tell you a little bit what the condensate is so you have a let's say when you learn quantum mechanics you learn that if you put a particle in a potential."
},
{
"end_time": 5173.899,
"index": 212,
"start_time": 5161.118,
"text": " What the particle is there moving in the in the potential but if you call it to the ground state it will let's say if you manage to the ground state the the atom will be completely the localized within the potential."
},
{
"end_time": 5199.582,
"index": 213,
"start_time": 5174.701,
"text": " So you don't know what the position of the atom is in that whole thing. No, that's really, I don't know when I did that in quantum mechanics. I loved it. Now think about having 10 to the eight, 10 to the 10 atoms, all cool down. But atoms are bosons so they can all occupy the same quantum state. So you can cool them all down to the ground state. And that is what is called a Bose Einstein condensate. So you have"
},
{
"end_time": 5228.012,
"index": 214,
"start_time": 5200.026,
"text": " The biggest system that behaves in a quantum mechanical way. And like I said in the experiment, people have been able to call these systems to have a nano Kelvin. Right. So I was wondering if then this would be a good system to test Roger's predictions. And that's what we did together. We said, okay, how would it go with a Bose-Einstein condensate? And well,"
},
{
"end_time": 5255.486,
"index": 215,
"start_time": 5228.951,
"text": " Also super complicated because you would have to create a super position of all the atoms on the left with all the atoms on the right and although the temperatures are that low. People have not been able to create the super positions are called new states because you have and zero zero and yes cool and you know what the record is by one of my colleagues call chris westbrook and he's been able to do two atoms."
},
{
"end_time": 5284.138,
"index": 216,
"start_time": 5256.049,
"text": " like so you can have many like you can have up to 10 to the like you can have many atoms in quantum states in a boson condensate but not many atoms in a spatial superposition of two different space locations that's where gravity acts so this is what i now have been working on in the last two years and well it's"
},
{
"end_time": 5307.449,
"index": 217,
"start_time": 5284.411,
"text": " It's not related to it's inspired by this work with roger but it's a complete new thing i hope i can talk about it at a later time with you but in that previous paper with roger you know we started things like roger had given formulas for uniform spheres and in a bc you could have pancakes or elongated bcs with different"
},
{
"end_time": 5334.94,
"index": 218,
"start_time": 5307.875,
"text": " Distributions of the density and we studied if these would enhance the effects predicted by Roger and then well you have a lot of losses and we studied the losses and so on and that's how we came up with this. Well with a BC you need at least 10 to the 9 particles maybe even 10 to the 10 in order to start being able to actually verify that"
},
{
"end_time": 5355.555,
"index": 219,
"start_time": 5335.555,
"text": " The energy uncertainty of gravitational origin that Roger predicts has an effect. So now I'm going to finish this part with the slides just telling you of an example of the work that I've done where I brought together quantum field theory and curved space time to let's say propose a new sensor."
},
{
"end_time": 5378.268,
"index": 220,
"start_time": 5356.084,
"text": " and um it it was quite bold because i came up with a proposal that you could use a Bose-Einstein condensate so let's say that the sample itself can be 100 micrometers 50 micrometers the the cloud of atoms sure and the experiment is again a tabletop experiment we could put it in this room no cool and i claim that you could use"
},
{
"end_time": 5403.985,
"index": 221,
"start_time": 5378.695,
"text": " The bc because you see an atom you we saw how precise they are and a bc you might want to see it as 10 to the eight atoms cool down to the ground state so this is a very precise it's a it's a system that is very sensitive to space time distortions and i made a proposal on how could you use the system to detect gravitational waves wow."
},
{
"end_time": 5430.367,
"index": 222,
"start_time": 5404.087,
"text": " quite crazy because gravitational waves are detected in LIGO where the apparatus measures you know each arm three kilometers so this is very bold and I've been like really kind of when I met Roger that was in 2017 I was really invested in that and trying to convince you know the community that"
},
{
"end_time": 5457.159,
"index": 223,
"start_time": 5430.742,
"text": " You need to do this experiment because it's really opens up a new direction. And Roger was trying to convince me to work on the collapse of the wave function due to gravity. I was very reluctant because I thought, no, no, I want, you know, I want to put my time and my energy into these. And well, after the years, Roger managed to pull me more into what he's doing."
},
{
"end_time": 5483.712,
"index": 224,
"start_time": 5457.585,
"text": " But yeah, so well, when you talk about using atoms to measure gravity, what we usually do in quantum technologies is an atom interferometer. So let's say you have a atom and you hit it with a laser with a photon and you make the atom, you put it in a superposition of two different positions, but they're free falling."
},
{
"end_time": 5510.555,
"index": 225,
"start_time": 5484.206,
"text": " So they follow different trajectories and then you recombine them with lasers and they recombine at a point. But because they went through different trajectories, they pick information in a phase that depends on the local gravitational field. And this is what a quantum gravimeter is interesting. And I put here a single particle detector because although they throw maybe 10 to the six atoms at once into the interferometer, they all the atoms are independent."
},
{
"end_time": 5535.111,
"index": 226,
"start_time": 5511.015,
"text": " and each atom goes through this superposition of trajectories and then they interfere at a point so i put here the interference is local because it's at the point where they recombine and then this is limited by the time of flight and the equation is very simple it's just this equation that's here basically depends with the time of flight squared which means the bigger the detector"
},
{
"end_time": 5555.35,
"index": 227,
"start_time": 5535.111,
"text": " The more precise it is that's why ligo is so big and they're thinking because they want to go to what i was with light but the principal is the same they now want to make a bigger detector in space called lisa to have more precision so i'm not in physics the tendency is to go very big."
},
{
"end_time": 5569.94,
"index": 228,
"start_time": 5555.35,
"text": " Big experiments, of course, are very expensive. And I, my, my husband says that I'm a rebel, like, you know, everybody's doing one thing, I always want to do something different that applies to everything in my life. Yeah, that's another aspect that unifies us."
},
{
"end_time": 5600.367,
"index": 229,
"start_time": 5571.647,
"text": " Yeah, no, it's like a contrarian at heart. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Exactly. So if everybody wants to be make big detected, I want to make them very small. So on. But it has paid off for me in science. Maybe sometimes in life can make me like a Grinch in Christmas and things like that. So I was like, Oh, I don't want to do what everybody does. So socially, I don't want to go to the movie that everybody's watching. But in science, it's been it's been interesting. Yeah, it's been good, you know. So"
},
{
"end_time": 5627.892,
"index": 230,
"start_time": 5600.657,
"text": " So, well, here I also write that this is compatible with Newtonian gravity, because this is an experiment that is described with the Schrodinger equation. And if you treat the local gravitational field by Newtonian gravity, everything works very nicely. And like I said, these are already commercial. My colleague, Philippe Boyer, has founded a company that he now sold called Mukens and there are other like Mark Kasevich does that as well."
},
{
"end_time": 5642.773,
"index": 231,
"start_time": 5628.183,
"text": " You cannot make them smaller than that because then you lose precision."
},
{
"end_time": 5673.746,
"index": 232,
"start_time": 5643.916,
"text": " And so if you wanted to get atom interferometer to apply them to fundamental physics to learn about the equivalence principle or to measure anything respect to gravity. So you want to make them more precise. You have to make them bigger. So Philippe Boyer did this amazing experiment in which he put his atom interferometer in a plane. So he flew the plane as well and let it free fall for a bit to get the long baselines."
},
{
"end_time": 5698.166,
"index": 233,
"start_time": 5674.07,
"text": " He also has an amazing experiment on the ground called, oh gosh, I forgot the name of it now, but it is like the arms of the Atom Interferometer are 300 meters long, so this is huge. You can see here sort of the tunnels and so on. And in Germany you have a drop tower"
},
{
"end_time": 5717.09,
"index": 234,
"start_time": 5698.558,
"text": " I'm that is like always like this like drop tower address yesterday they put up a drop tower they put up there like an atom interferometer and then they let it drop to get these long interferometer arms and be able to be more precise."
},
{
"end_time": 5735.333,
"index": 235,
"start_time": 5717.483,
"text": " Some other people also look at these atom interferometry and put lasers and slow down the atoms so that they get, so for example this paper by Guillermino Tino is really beautiful, trying to miniaturize the detectors."
},
{
"end_time": 5763.285,
"index": 236,
"start_time": 5735.913,
"text": " So, um, so what I came up with, with this idea was, well, if you're trying to do interferometry in using these sort of call it spatial interferometry, because the atom goes through two different positions, the precision is going to be limited by how big it is. So you are going to have to make them bigger to be more precise. But if instead of that, we do interferometry, not in space, but in frequency,"
},
{
"end_time": 5790.981,
"index": 237,
"start_time": 5763.831,
"text": " Then what is going to limit your precision is time. So the states, so the sensor can be very small, but you're going to have to produce quantum states that live longer in time. So with this idea that I called frequency interferometry, I came up with a number of sensors and including the gravitational wave detector."
},
{
"end_time": 5819.36,
"index": 238,
"start_time": 5791.51,
"text": " And then I applied it to searches for dark energy, searches for dark matter. I also patent an idea on how to use these states to measure the local gravitational field. So this might have commercial applications in the future. And I like that because I like more fundamental questions. Actually, my favorite question is like, what's the nature of reality? What are we doing here? What am I? It's a dangerous question, huh? Yeah, very."
},
{
"end_time": 5839.787,
"index": 239,
"start_time": 5819.787,
"text": " All of these things but when you're doing that and you find some interesting things why not also come up with something that can be patented and commercialized and so on. When I met Roger I was really invested in this and I'm still working on it. I have some recent results."
},
{
"end_time": 5867.619,
"index": 240,
"start_time": 5840.179,
"text": " One of them is not it was in the old in the old size it doesn't matter but i think i think i managed to give you a flavor of what you can do by bringing together quantum technologies and apply them to fundamental quick questions and where things are at i think i want to finish by by saying that this last proposal is an example where we used"
},
{
"end_time": 5882.824,
"index": 241,
"start_time": 5867.978,
"text": " Not quantum mechanics, but let's say a more fundamental theory because it takes into account relativity, which is quantum field theory in curved space time. And although it's not the finished theory because it cannot address the question of super positions of mass."
},
{
"end_time": 5908.882,
"index": 242,
"start_time": 5883.063,
"text": " You can apply it without problem to specific cases like the propagation of space-time of packages in the space-time of the earth and many other interesting instances. This allows you to come up with let's say new sensors and the theoretical predictions that we've made is that these sensors are so in principle they still have to test them."
},
{
"end_time": 5931.323,
"index": 243,
"start_time": 5909.224,
"text": " So precise that you might be able to detect a gravitational wave with a tiny system and that these are for high frequencies by the way they don't really compete with like go because like go. Works in a different frequency regime this would be for frequencies higher than the ones that like go detect. But you know you know."
},
{
"end_time": 5949.07,
"index": 244,
"start_time": 5932.363,
"text": " Let's say using these patches of the theory that incorporate relativity, I think already show you that you can in principle make sensors that allow you to go closer to these scales where I was talking about that we don't have the guide to unify."
},
{
"end_time": 5976.834,
"index": 245,
"start_time": 5949.684,
"text": " You know when people were trying to detect gravitational waves, the first apparatus that were built in Maryland, you can still see them, they're these Weber bars. So people predicted, Weber predicted that these, the phonons, so the vibrational modes of these big metallic bars would resonate with gravitational waves and then he claimed that he actually had detected one and then this got sort of controversial and then eventually disproved."
},
{
"end_time": 5984.002,
"index": 246,
"start_time": 5976.834,
"text": " Actually the proposal that we made in which you have you can implement it by using a bc."
},
{
"end_time": 6011.561,
"index": 247,
"start_time": 5984.394,
"text": " I'm using the vibration of most like the phone on modes of the bc but because you can call the bc to have a nano calving this is ten orders of magnitude cooler than the weather bars were cool initially then and you can prepare the phone in a highly quantum state which you cannot do unless you go to those cold temperatures and then you can exploit all the sensitivities that we were talking about quantum technologies to"
},
{
"end_time": 6037.944,
"index": 248,
"start_time": 6012.073,
"text": " see changes in the space time. And that's how we came up with that proposal. You know, like, I think I can talk forever. So maybe it's good to leave it here. I think let me let's see if I had like some kind of concluding. Well, yes, my concluding side was to say that I've managed to raise funding to build a new experiment. So I'm working with Chris"
},
{
"end_time": 6067.21,
"index": 249,
"start_time": 6038.302,
"text": " Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah."
},
{
"end_time": 6092.21,
"index": 250,
"start_time": 6068.012,
"text": " Professor, thank you so much. You've given far more than just a flavor. I lost count of how many pioneering ideas there are here with actual practical consequences in the near term, near term being within a couple of years. I don't recall the last time that's happened on on this channel. And all I do is interview people that are at the bleeding edge in their field. So thank you for that. Thanks."
},
{
"end_time": 6107.312,
"index": 251,
"start_time": 6092.995,
"text": " Yeah, thank you. It's a big pleasure for me to be on your channel. The pleasure is all mine. Thank you. Great, thanks. Also, thank you to our partner, The Economist."
},
{
"end_time": 6124.548,
"index": 252,
"start_time": 6109.565,
"text": " Firstly, thank you for watching, thank you for listening. There's now a website, curtjymungle.org, and that has a mailing list. The reason being that large platforms like YouTube, like Patreon, they can disable you for whatever reason, whenever they like."
},
{
"end_time": 6150.111,
"index": 253,
"start_time": 6124.77,
"text": " That's just part of the terms of service. Now, a direct mailing list ensures that I have an untrammeled communication with you. Plus, soon I'll be releasing a one-page PDF of my top 10 toes. It's not as Quentin Tarantino as it sounds like. Secondly, if you haven't subscribed or clicked that like button, now is the time to do so. Why? Because each subscribe, each like helps YouTube push this content to more people"
},
{
"end_time": 6169.48,
"index": 254,
"start_time": 6150.111,
"text": " I also found out last year that external links count plenty toward the algorithm, which means that whenever you share on Twitter, say on Facebook or even on Reddit, etc., it shows YouTube, hey, people are talking about this content outside of YouTube, which in turn"
},
{
"end_time": 6191.613,
"index": 255,
"start_time": 6169.701,
"text": " Thirdly, there's a remarkably active Discord and subreddit for theories of everything where people explicate toes, they disagree respectfully about theories, and build as a community our own toe. Links to both are in the description. Fourthly, you should know this podcast is on iTunes, it's on Spotify, it's on all of the audio platforms."
},
{
"end_time": 6206.8,
"index": 256,
"start_time": 6191.613,
"text": " All you have"
},
{
"end_time": 6230.162,
"index": 257,
"start_time": 6206.8,
"text": " This is"
},
{
"end_time": 6247.722,
"index": 258,
"start_time": 6230.162,
"text": " You also get early access to ad free episodes, whether it's audio or video, it's audio in the case of Patreon, video in the case of YouTube. For instance, this episode that you're listening to right now was released a few days earlier. Every dollar helps far more than you think. Either way, your viewership is generosity enough. Thank you so much."
},
{
"end_time": 6270.435,
"index": 259,
"start_time": 6258.49,
"text": " Think Verizon, the best 5G network, is expensive? Think again. Bring in your AT&T or T-Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal. Now what to do with your unwanted bills? Ever seen an origami version of the Miami Bull?"
},
{
"end_time": 6288.609,
"index": 260,
"start_time": 6270.913,
"text": " Jokes aside, Verizon has the most ways to save on phones and plans where you can get a single line with everything you need. So bring in your bill to your local Miami Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal."
}
]
}No transcript available.