Audio Player
Starting at:
Lue Elizondo Reveals The Terrifying Truth Behind UFOs [Compilation from 2021 / 2022]
September 1, 2023
•
19:07
•
undefined
Audio:
Download MP3
ℹ️ Timestamps visible: Timestamps may be inaccurate if the MP3 has dynamically injected ads. Hide timestamps.
Transcript
Enhanced with Timestamps
43 sentences
2,626 words
Method: api-polled
Transcription time: 18m 12s
The Economist covers math, physics, philosophy, and AI in a manner that shows how different countries perceive developments and how they impact markets. They recently published a piece on China's new neutrino detector. They cover extending life via mitochondrial transplants, creating an entirely new field of medicine. But it's also not just science they analyze.
Culture, they analyze finance, economics, business, international affairs across every region. I'm particularly liking their new insider feature. It was just launched this month. It gives you, it gives me, a front row access to The Economist's internal editorial debates.
Where senior editors argue through the news with world leaders and policy makers in twice weekly long format shows. Basically an extremely high quality podcast. Whether it's scientific innovation or shifting global politics, The Economist provides comprehensive coverage beyond headlines. As a toe listener, you get a special discount. Head over to economist.com slash TOE to subscribe. That's economist.com slash TOE for your discount.
This first clip went viral on YouTube and is from 2020. If the general public knew or saw what you saw, what would the next week look like? How would the public react? Somber. I think there would be this big exhale for about a day.
and then this, uh, turning inward and trying to reflect on what this means to us and our species and ourselves. Uh, I think, uh, sorry, like a sigh of relief, somber meaning serious, not, not like Hollywood portrays people partying in the streets and silliness with that. Um,
I think you would have some people perhaps turning to religion more so. You might have some people turning away from them. I think you're going to have, at that point, the philosophical and theological questions will be raised and people will have some serious soul searching to do, no pun intended. And I don't think that's bad, by the way.
I think a lot of folks that have spent their times in this community being charlatans will have been exposed and they will be probably unemployed and probably have to change their names because you know the rest of society will look at them in an unfavorable light. I think there are some unsung heroes that will probably come to light and the world will appreciate their contributions to this topic.
I think the scientific and academic communities, no, I can't give those names. I know what I was going to say is names that have been announced before when you say the unsung heroes or new names have been announced before. I think the scientific and academic community is going to have to take a real hard look at itself and see why it repeated the same mistakes it did when Galileo first proposed that the Earth was not the center of the solar system.
Hubris is a big part of that. And then I think, you know, maybe we start the international conversation, say, okay, we realize that there's some things out there that are probably well beyond our petty discrepancies we have with each other. Maybe we really need to start working together on this, realize that we are really a global family. Doesn't matter where you're from, it doesn't matter what your religion is or culture or your color or anything else. We are all
We are all brothers and sisters on this tiny little rock called Earth, this pale blue dot that's hurtling through space. We may unify us. Well, I would certainly hope so, unless we allow our poor nature to interfere and we look at this as opportunities to subjugate each other. I would hope that's not the case.
This second clip gives context to the first and was asked in 2021. The last time we spoke, there were two comments that you said that stood out to me. Well, one was the somber, the somber heard around the world in a sense. And then you clarified that or you added to that by saying sobering. Oh, I was wondering we can get to that. And then also you mentioned that the charlatans of the world will be shown to be charlatans. And I, again, don't know much about this UFO community, but people in the comments were saying, did he mean Stephen Greer? So
Why don't you comment on that? You can be as diplomatic as you like. I know that you're, you're a relative diplomatic person. Yeah. Let me, um, let me start with by, by somber or sobering. Um, imagine, imagine everything you've been taught.
Whether it's through Sunday school or through regular formal education in school or what our political leaders have told us. And yes, even maybe our mothers and fathers around the dinner table have told us or maybe at bedtime about who we are, right? Our background and our past. What if all of that turned out to be not entirely accurate?
In fact, the very history of our species, the meaning what it means to be a human being and our place in this universe. What if all that is now in question? What if it turns out that a lot of the things that we thought were one way aren't? Are we prepared to have that honest question with ourselves?
Are we prepared to recognize that we're not at the top of the food chain potentially? That we're not the alpha predator? That we are maybe somewhere in the middle? It's interesting because
I was having a discussion with a friend not too long ago. We called him Greybeards in the government. Really, really smart guy. I'm not going to mention his name, but I was talking to him probably a couple of months ago. This is a guy who was always paid to solve the hard problems for the US government. Cold War. How do we solve that? How do we do these big things? How do we go in and beat the Russians at their own game?
So this guy I respect tremendously, and we had a conversation. He said, you know, Lou, mankind's been around for a little while. And for most of that time, mankind's been around. We've been smack in the middle of the food chain. We've been, you know, we ate a lot of things. A lot of things ate us. And that's just the bottom line. And about 70,000 years ago, something fundamentally changed. Something changed. And our species,
was instantly catapulted to the very top of our planet as far as predatory animals. And now all of a sudden, we became the most feared. We were the most lethal and the most successful. In fact,
Most of the large species that existed on this planet went extinct because of us, believe it or not, because we were eating all of it. There were a couple species that did very, very well with our ascension, our immediate ascension, and we brought a couple species with us. The dog is an example where the dog species benefited greatly with mankind's ascension as the alpha predator and wanted to be succeeding as well, doing very well off of that.
That changed the entire global landscape of our planet. Almost overnight, large animals went extinct because of us. What if it turns out that there's another species that is even higher on that ladder than we are? Do we need the social institutions?
that we have today? Will we need governmental and religious organizations that we have today if it turns out that there is something else or someone else that is technologically more advanced and perhaps from an evolutionary perspective more advanced? Have we been wasting our time all this time or are we doing exactly what we're supposed to be doing?
Does it turn out that mankind is, in fact, just another animal in the zoo? Because we thought ourselves as a zookeeper before, but maybe we're just another exhibit inside the zoo. What would that mean to us? When I say sombering and sobering, I mean that
There's going to come a point in this conversation where we're going to have to do a lot of reconciling with ourselves, whatever that means, from whatever philosophical background you have. This is going to impact every single one of us the same and yet equally and yet differently. And I think that's important. Do we find ourselves in a situation where history may have to be rewritten? So that's what I meant.
Now, as far as the Charlottesons, I'm not going to give any attention to individual Charlottesons because they already have enough attention. They know exactly who I'm referring to. These are individuals who have made a cottage industry, a career of taking people's hard-earned money and deceiving them and not only deceiving them, but having them sign non-disclosure agreements to make sure they don't tell the world that they've been deceived.
and preying upon people who for whatever reason believe in them. People who say my narrative is the only narrative and anybody else who tells you otherwise is trying to hurt you. I have all the answers. I have the solution. Anybody who says that I think is a charlatan.
And I think we need to be very, very mindful of that. They're very dangerous. And they're dangerous for several reasons, because if they're lying to you about that, they're probably lying to you about other things in their life, their past life, and their current life, which may or may not come to light at some point. These are people who have taken advantage of people for a very long time. And you have to be careful.
Think Verizon, the best 5G network is expensive? Think again. Bring in your AT&T or T-Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal.
Jokes aside, Verizon has the most ways to save on phones and plans where everyone in the family can choose their own plan and save. So bring in your bill to your local Miami Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal.
What else are the motivations of some of these charlatans or potentially could be in their motivation other than financial? Well, look at any religious charlatans, it's the same thing. It's a cult personality. It's somebody who, for whatever reason, thinks it's all about them and they manage the narrative. It goes to the basic core of pride and ego in human beings and narcissistic behavior, you know, real true deep psychological issues. Some sociopathic, to be honest with you.
Um, is there any gold in that rubble? I'm sorry. Is there any gold in that rubble? As in, it's all of what they're saying. Some of these charlatans, we don't have to name names. I know. I think, I think, I think there's always, there's always fibers of truth in, in, in a blanket of lies. Um, because that's, that's what holds it together. There are some, there are some aspects of truth. The problem is, um, when you take that truth and you distort it,
There's people in history that were very good at convincing large amounts of people that they have the answer. I don't need to go back into history to say which ones those are, but you have characters like Jim Jones, Heaven's Gate is an example, even Hitler to some degree, where they were very charismatic people.
who got people in this web and they didn't realize it until it was too late. I just think when you're creating all these shell organizations and pass-throughs and paying people off to do things for you to deceive other people, I think is problematic. Again, I'm not going to mention names. I think most people are smart enough to see through it.
My concern are those people who already sucked into it. It becomes occult and it becomes brainwashing and manipulation and that's my concern because it gives a terrible name to the effort and making false accusations. I think there's an old saying, and I'll see if I can remember it, that
Ye be careful of the knife ye uses to stabeth the back of others, for surely that knife will be used against you in the future or at some point. Karma is a bitch. Be careful. Mother nature has a vote. She's got a way of always squaring things up at the end. That's what I've seen anyways.
Remember earlier, I was asking you, what can we do as a culture? I think based on some of your statements, what we can do is something like we've already been doing, which is keep talking about it so that we can destigmatize it. I know that I don't particularly like the word destigmatization. I think it's been taken by certain people, but essentially to destigmatize. However,
There does seem to be the tendency from those who are believers in or who are part of the UFO community who deride people like see Neil deGrasse Tyson and other skeptics deride the UFO community. And I don't think they should do that. But then I also don't think that they should be met with condescension as well, because I think that that comes back at you. I think that love and extending an arm and an olive branch is what will
Kurt, you're right. You're absolutely right. That's a good point. Let me talk a little bit about Mr. Neil deGrasse Tyson. First of all, he's one of the few shows I used to watch a lot. I loved his perspective.
Let's talk about his background. This is a person who was a bit of a maverick. He cut his teeth and really made his bones by supporting and defending a theory that really was a hypothesis at the time, an outlandish hypothesis. There were these supermassive objects
In our universe that were so dense that they created a gravity well, they created a black hole in space-time where light itself couldn't even escape. And although we can't see it directly, we can't prove its existence, we think they're there, right? Now, a lot of the scientific community said it's hogwash, you know, it's just, it's a theoretical anomaly that isn't real.
And yet, Neil deGrasse Tyson did exactly that. He supported the hypothesis and theory that there are these things you'll never be able to see with the naked eye, but they fundamentally, they're there, and they're hundreds of millions of light years away. Well, it's funny because that same spirit used to prove something you can never see that is there, for some reason, he seems to have forgotten that in this topic.
Because we're talking about the same thing, we're talking about something that is hard to see directly sometimes. But we can see its impact on the environment around it. And to some degree, maybe, you know, warping space time and but it's not hundreds of millions of miles away, it's right here. And I don't understand how you can support in one hand, the
If you enjoyed that clip, then the full podcast is out right now. You can click around here. Enjoy. I also have a conversation with Neil deGrasse Tyson recorded just a few weeks ago on the very topic of UFO whistleblowers. Links are in the description to both podcasts with Lou Elizondo. Actually, there are three that have been recorded with theories of everything, as well as the Neil deGrasse Tyson podcast.
Subscribe to theories of everything to get notified of upcoming podcast is there a new full length podcast every week on the topics of mathematics physics consciousness free will and ai.
▶ View Full JSON Data (Word-Level Timestamps)
{
"source": "transcribe.metaboat.io",
"workspace_id": "AXs1igz",
"job_seq": 7540,
"audio_duration_seconds": 1092.21,
"completed_at": "2025-12-01T00:47:02Z",
"segments": [
{
"end_time": 20.896,
"index": 0,
"start_time": 0.009,
"text": " The Economist covers math, physics, philosophy, and AI in a manner that shows how different countries perceive developments and how they impact markets. They recently published a piece on China's new neutrino detector. They cover extending life via mitochondrial transplants, creating an entirely new field of medicine. But it's also not just science they analyze."
},
{
"end_time": 36.067,
"index": 1,
"start_time": 20.896,
"text": " Culture, they analyze finance, economics, business, international affairs across every region. I'm particularly liking their new insider feature. It was just launched this month. It gives you, it gives me, a front row access to The Economist's internal editorial debates."
},
{
"end_time": 64.514,
"index": 2,
"start_time": 36.34,
"text": " Where senior editors argue through the news with world leaders and policy makers in twice weekly long format shows. Basically an extremely high quality podcast. Whether it's scientific innovation or shifting global politics, The Economist provides comprehensive coverage beyond headlines. As a toe listener, you get a special discount. Head over to economist.com slash TOE to subscribe. That's economist.com slash TOE for your discount."
},
{
"end_time": 92.398,
"index": 3,
"start_time": 66.323,
"text": " This first clip went viral on YouTube and is from 2020. If the general public knew or saw what you saw, what would the next week look like? How would the public react? Somber. I think there would be this big exhale for about a day."
},
{
"end_time": 117.944,
"index": 4,
"start_time": 93.524,
"text": " and then this, uh, turning inward and trying to reflect on what this means to us and our species and ourselves. Uh, I think, uh, sorry, like a sigh of relief, somber meaning serious, not, not like Hollywood portrays people partying in the streets and silliness with that. Um,"
},
{
"end_time": 142.193,
"index": 5,
"start_time": 118.302,
"text": " I think you would have some people perhaps turning to religion more so. You might have some people turning away from them. I think you're going to have, at that point, the philosophical and theological questions will be raised and people will have some serious soul searching to do, no pun intended. And I don't think that's bad, by the way."
},
{
"end_time": 169.48,
"index": 6,
"start_time": 142.619,
"text": " I think a lot of folks that have spent their times in this community being charlatans will have been exposed and they will be probably unemployed and probably have to change their names because you know the rest of society will look at them in an unfavorable light. I think there are some unsung heroes that will probably come to light and the world will appreciate their contributions to this topic."
},
{
"end_time": 198.012,
"index": 7,
"start_time": 170.742,
"text": " I think the scientific and academic communities, no, I can't give those names. I know what I was going to say is names that have been announced before when you say the unsung heroes or new names have been announced before. I think the scientific and academic community is going to have to take a real hard look at itself and see why it repeated the same mistakes it did when Galileo first proposed that the Earth was not the center of the solar system."
},
{
"end_time": 228.251,
"index": 8,
"start_time": 198.49,
"text": " Hubris is a big part of that. And then I think, you know, maybe we start the international conversation, say, okay, we realize that there's some things out there that are probably well beyond our petty discrepancies we have with each other. Maybe we really need to start working together on this, realize that we are really a global family. Doesn't matter where you're from, it doesn't matter what your religion is or culture or your color or anything else. We are all"
},
{
"end_time": 257.261,
"index": 9,
"start_time": 228.575,
"text": " We are all brothers and sisters on this tiny little rock called Earth, this pale blue dot that's hurtling through space. We may unify us. Well, I would certainly hope so, unless we allow our poor nature to interfere and we look at this as opportunities to subjugate each other. I would hope that's not the case."
},
{
"end_time": 287.261,
"index": 10,
"start_time": 257.568,
"text": " This second clip gives context to the first and was asked in 2021. The last time we spoke, there were two comments that you said that stood out to me. Well, one was the somber, the somber heard around the world in a sense. And then you clarified that or you added to that by saying sobering. Oh, I was wondering we can get to that. And then also you mentioned that the charlatans of the world will be shown to be charlatans. And I, again, don't know much about this UFO community, but people in the comments were saying, did he mean Stephen Greer? So"
},
{
"end_time": 313.404,
"index": 11,
"start_time": 287.671,
"text": " Why don't you comment on that? You can be as diplomatic as you like. I know that you're, you're a relative diplomatic person. Yeah. Let me, um, let me start with by, by somber or sobering. Um, imagine, imagine everything you've been taught."
},
{
"end_time": 343.558,
"index": 12,
"start_time": 314.411,
"text": " Whether it's through Sunday school or through regular formal education in school or what our political leaders have told us. And yes, even maybe our mothers and fathers around the dinner table have told us or maybe at bedtime about who we are, right? Our background and our past. What if all of that turned out to be not entirely accurate?"
},
{
"end_time": 373.439,
"index": 13,
"start_time": 344.65,
"text": " In fact, the very history of our species, the meaning what it means to be a human being and our place in this universe. What if all that is now in question? What if it turns out that a lot of the things that we thought were one way aren't? Are we prepared to have that honest question with ourselves?"
},
{
"end_time": 392.21,
"index": 14,
"start_time": 374.326,
"text": " Are we prepared to recognize that we're not at the top of the food chain potentially? That we're not the alpha predator? That we are maybe somewhere in the middle? It's interesting because"
},
{
"end_time": 419.838,
"index": 15,
"start_time": 393.899,
"text": " I was having a discussion with a friend not too long ago. We called him Greybeards in the government. Really, really smart guy. I'm not going to mention his name, but I was talking to him probably a couple of months ago. This is a guy who was always paid to solve the hard problems for the US government. Cold War. How do we solve that? How do we do these big things? How do we go in and beat the Russians at their own game?"
},
{
"end_time": 448.541,
"index": 16,
"start_time": 420.657,
"text": " So this guy I respect tremendously, and we had a conversation. He said, you know, Lou, mankind's been around for a little while. And for most of that time, mankind's been around. We've been smack in the middle of the food chain. We've been, you know, we ate a lot of things. A lot of things ate us. And that's just the bottom line. And about 70,000 years ago, something fundamentally changed. Something changed. And our species,"
},
{
"end_time": 467.295,
"index": 17,
"start_time": 448.882,
"text": " was instantly catapulted to the very top of our planet as far as predatory animals. And now all of a sudden, we became the most feared. We were the most lethal and the most successful. In fact,"
},
{
"end_time": 493.797,
"index": 18,
"start_time": 467.773,
"text": " Most of the large species that existed on this planet went extinct because of us, believe it or not, because we were eating all of it. There were a couple species that did very, very well with our ascension, our immediate ascension, and we brought a couple species with us. The dog is an example where the dog species benefited greatly with mankind's ascension as the alpha predator and wanted to be succeeding as well, doing very well off of that."
},
{
"end_time": 525.265,
"index": 19,
"start_time": 496.237,
"text": " That changed the entire global landscape of our planet. Almost overnight, large animals went extinct because of us. What if it turns out that there's another species that is even higher on that ladder than we are? Do we need the social institutions?"
},
{
"end_time": 555.503,
"index": 20,
"start_time": 526.34,
"text": " that we have today? Will we need governmental and religious organizations that we have today if it turns out that there is something else or someone else that is technologically more advanced and perhaps from an evolutionary perspective more advanced? Have we been wasting our time all this time or are we doing exactly what we're supposed to be doing?"
},
{
"end_time": 579.77,
"index": 21,
"start_time": 555.981,
"text": " Does it turn out that mankind is, in fact, just another animal in the zoo? Because we thought ourselves as a zookeeper before, but maybe we're just another exhibit inside the zoo. What would that mean to us? When I say sombering and sobering, I mean that"
},
{
"end_time": 610.452,
"index": 22,
"start_time": 580.862,
"text": " There's going to come a point in this conversation where we're going to have to do a lot of reconciling with ourselves, whatever that means, from whatever philosophical background you have. This is going to impact every single one of us the same and yet equally and yet differently. And I think that's important. Do we find ourselves in a situation where history may have to be rewritten? So that's what I meant."
},
{
"end_time": 636.323,
"index": 23,
"start_time": 610.845,
"text": " Now, as far as the Charlottesons, I'm not going to give any attention to individual Charlottesons because they already have enough attention. They know exactly who I'm referring to. These are individuals who have made a cottage industry, a career of taking people's hard-earned money and deceiving them and not only deceiving them, but having them sign non-disclosure agreements to make sure they don't tell the world that they've been deceived."
},
{
"end_time": 663.319,
"index": 24,
"start_time": 637.346,
"text": " and preying upon people who for whatever reason believe in them. People who say my narrative is the only narrative and anybody else who tells you otherwise is trying to hurt you. I have all the answers. I have the solution. Anybody who says that I think is a charlatan."
},
{
"end_time": 689.906,
"index": 25,
"start_time": 664.206,
"text": " And I think we need to be very, very mindful of that. They're very dangerous. And they're dangerous for several reasons, because if they're lying to you about that, they're probably lying to you about other things in their life, their past life, and their current life, which may or may not come to light at some point. These are people who have taken advantage of people for a very long time. And you have to be careful."
},
{
"end_time": 698.575,
"index": 26,
"start_time": 690.589,
"text": " Think Verizon, the best 5G network is expensive? Think again. Bring in your AT&T or T-Mobile bill to a Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal."
},
{
"end_time": 721.152,
"index": 27,
"start_time": 701.852,
"text": " Jokes aside, Verizon has the most ways to save on phones and plans where everyone in the family can choose their own plan and save. So bring in your bill to your local Miami Verizon store today and we'll give you a better deal."
},
{
"end_time": 750.794,
"index": 28,
"start_time": 721.698,
"text": " What else are the motivations of some of these charlatans or potentially could be in their motivation other than financial? Well, look at any religious charlatans, it's the same thing. It's a cult personality. It's somebody who, for whatever reason, thinks it's all about them and they manage the narrative. It goes to the basic core of pride and ego in human beings and narcissistic behavior, you know, real true deep psychological issues. Some sociopathic, to be honest with you."
},
{
"end_time": 780.879,
"index": 29,
"start_time": 751.493,
"text": " Um, is there any gold in that rubble? I'm sorry. Is there any gold in that rubble? As in, it's all of what they're saying. Some of these charlatans, we don't have to name names. I know. I think, I think, I think there's always, there's always fibers of truth in, in, in a blanket of lies. Um, because that's, that's what holds it together. There are some, there are some aspects of truth. The problem is, um, when you take that truth and you distort it,"
},
{
"end_time": 807.415,
"index": 30,
"start_time": 781.527,
"text": " There's people in history that were very good at convincing large amounts of people that they have the answer. I don't need to go back into history to say which ones those are, but you have characters like Jim Jones, Heaven's Gate is an example, even Hitler to some degree, where they were very charismatic people."
},
{
"end_time": 833.114,
"index": 31,
"start_time": 808.012,
"text": " who got people in this web and they didn't realize it until it was too late. I just think when you're creating all these shell organizations and pass-throughs and paying people off to do things for you to deceive other people, I think is problematic. Again, I'm not going to mention names. I think most people are smart enough to see through it."
},
{
"end_time": 859.138,
"index": 32,
"start_time": 833.439,
"text": " My concern are those people who already sucked into it. It becomes occult and it becomes brainwashing and manipulation and that's my concern because it gives a terrible name to the effort and making false accusations. I think there's an old saying, and I'll see if I can remember it, that"
},
{
"end_time": 890.418,
"index": 33,
"start_time": 864.48,
"text": " Ye be careful of the knife ye uses to stabeth the back of others, for surely that knife will be used against you in the future or at some point. Karma is a bitch. Be careful. Mother nature has a vote. She's got a way of always squaring things up at the end. That's what I've seen anyways."
},
{
"end_time": 916.886,
"index": 34,
"start_time": 893.729,
"text": " Remember earlier, I was asking you, what can we do as a culture? I think based on some of your statements, what we can do is something like we've already been doing, which is keep talking about it so that we can destigmatize it. I know that I don't particularly like the word destigmatization. I think it's been taken by certain people, but essentially to destigmatize. However,"
},
{
"end_time": 945.06,
"index": 35,
"start_time": 917.534,
"text": " There does seem to be the tendency from those who are believers in or who are part of the UFO community who deride people like see Neil deGrasse Tyson and other skeptics deride the UFO community. And I don't think they should do that. But then I also don't think that they should be met with condescension as well, because I think that that comes back at you. I think that love and extending an arm and an olive branch is what will"
},
{
"end_time": 958.677,
"index": 36,
"start_time": 945.998,
"text": " Kurt, you're right. You're absolutely right. That's a good point. Let me talk a little bit about Mr. Neil deGrasse Tyson. First of all, he's one of the few shows I used to watch a lot. I loved his perspective."
},
{
"end_time": 976.203,
"index": 37,
"start_time": 959.053,
"text": " Let's talk about his background. This is a person who was a bit of a maverick. He cut his teeth and really made his bones by supporting and defending a theory that really was a hypothesis at the time, an outlandish hypothesis. There were these supermassive objects"
},
{
"end_time": 997.807,
"index": 38,
"start_time": 976.698,
"text": " In our universe that were so dense that they created a gravity well, they created a black hole in space-time where light itself couldn't even escape. And although we can't see it directly, we can't prove its existence, we think they're there, right? Now, a lot of the scientific community said it's hogwash, you know, it's just, it's a theoretical anomaly that isn't real."
},
{
"end_time": 1027.534,
"index": 39,
"start_time": 998.285,
"text": " And yet, Neil deGrasse Tyson did exactly that. He supported the hypothesis and theory that there are these things you'll never be able to see with the naked eye, but they fundamentally, they're there, and they're hundreds of millions of light years away. Well, it's funny because that same spirit used to prove something you can never see that is there, for some reason, he seems to have forgotten that in this topic."
},
{
"end_time": 1053.951,
"index": 40,
"start_time": 1028.131,
"text": " Because we're talking about the same thing, we're talking about something that is hard to see directly sometimes. But we can see its impact on the environment around it. And to some degree, maybe, you know, warping space time and but it's not hundreds of millions of miles away, it's right here. And I don't understand how you can support in one hand, the"
},
{
"end_time": 1082.961,
"index": 41,
"start_time": 1054.718,
"text": " If you enjoyed that clip, then the full podcast is out right now. You can click around here. Enjoy. I also have a conversation with Neil deGrasse Tyson recorded just a few weeks ago on the very topic of UFO whistleblowers. Links are in the description to both podcasts with Lou Elizondo. Actually, there are three that have been recorded with theories of everything, as well as the Neil deGrasse Tyson podcast."
},
{
"end_time": 1092.21,
"index": 42,
"start_time": 1082.961,
"text": " Subscribe to theories of everything to get notified of upcoming podcast is there a new full length podcast every week on the topics of mathematics physics consciousness free will and ai."
}
]
}
No transcript available.